What is the Connection Between the ABC Conjecture and Fermat's Last Theorem?

  • Thread starter Thread starter PFanalog57
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Lost Proof
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around mathematical expressions involving powers and their relationships, particularly focusing on the implications of the ABC conjecture and Fermat's Last Theorem. It asserts that for prime numbers p greater than 2, integers x, y, and z cannot satisfy certain equations, while integers a, b, and c can take on any positive values. The conversation highlights the failure of specific congruences for p greater than 2, contrasting with their validity for p equal to 2. Participants express confusion over the relevance of some statements and the need for clearer definitions regarding Fermat's theorem. The overall consensus emphasizes the complexity of proving relationships among these integers under the specified conditions.
PFanalog57
Messages
384
Reaction score
0
5^1 = 1*0 + 5

5^2 = 2*10 + 5

5^3 = 3*40 + 5

5^p = p*a + 5

x^p = p*a + x



x^p = p*a + x

y^p = p*b + y

z^p = p*c + z



...x^p + y^p = z^p



p*a + x + p*b + y = p*c + z

p*[a + b - c] = z - [x + y]


p = [z - (x + y)]/[a + b - c]



http://www.maa.org/mathland/mathtrek_12_8.html


Astonishingly, a proof of the ABC conjecture would provide a way of establishing Fermat's last theorem in less than a page of mathematical reasoning. Indeed, many famous conjectures and theorems in number theory would follow immediately from the ABC conjecture, sometimes in just a few lines.



 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
how does this prove that x,y and z can't be integers when p>2? Also a,b and as far as I know can be anything you want.
 
FulhamFan3 said:
how does this prove that x,y and z can't be integers when p>2? Also a,b and as far as I know can be anything you want.


p, x, y, a,b,c, are always integers > 0, when p is a prime number. When p is 1, a = 0, b = 0, and c = 0.


z and c cannot be a +integer for p > 2.


[x^p - x]/p = a

[y^p - y]/p = b

[z^p - z]/p = c


for example:


[3^2 - 3]/2 = 3

[3^3 - 3]/3 = 8

[3^5 - 3]/5 = 48

[+integer^p - +integer]/p = another +integer.

It works for all prime numbers.


3^2 + 4^2 = 5^2

2*3 + 3 = 3^2

2*6 + 4 = 4^2



2*3 + 4*3 + 3 + 4 = 6*3 + 7 = 5^2
 
Last edited:
Russel Rierson,

I don't know why this is here and no in the number theory section of the math board.

But as long as it's here, you lost me on your ifrst line: 5^1 = 1*0 + 5
 
Russell E. Rierson said:
p, x, y, a,b,c, are always integers > 0, when p is a prime number. When p is 1, a = 0, b = 0, and c = 0.


z and c cannot be a +integer for p > 2.

z and c can be integers when p>2. you also have to prove that statement you can't just say it.

Also fermat's theorem as far as I know isn't just for primes, it's for all numbers. Unless this is some other theorem by fermat. In which case you need to state it so we know what your talking about.
 
Last edited:
FulhamFan3 said:
z and c can be integers when p>2. you also have to prove that statement you can't just say it.

Also fermat's theorem as far as I know isn't just for primes, it's for all numbers. Unless this is some other theorem by fermat. In which case you need to state it so we know what your talking about.


If p = 2 :

x^2 = 2*[1 + 2 + 3+...+ x-1] + x

2^2 = 2*[1] + 2

3^2 = 2*[1 + 2] + 3

4^2 = 2*[1 + 2 + 3] + 4

5^2 = 2*[1 + 2 + 3 + 4] + 5

etc...

This congruence does not hold for p > 2
 
5^2 = 2*[1 + 2 + 3 + 4] + 5


5^2 = 2*[1 + 2] + 2*[3 + 4] + 5



5^2 = 2*[1 + 2] + 2*[3 + (4 - 1)] + 5 + 2*1



5^2 = 2*[1 + 2] + 2*[3 + 3] + 7



5^2 = 2*[1 + 2] + 3 + 2*[ 1 + 2 + 3] + 4



5^2 = 3^2 + 4^2
 

Similar threads

Replies
15
Views
2K
2
Replies
91
Views
6K
Replies
2
Views
2K
2
Replies
60
Views
11K
Replies
5
Views
553
Back
Top