What Is the Correct Calculation for the Width of the Central Blue Light Fringe?

  • Thread starter Thread starter aurao2003
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Fringe Light
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the width of the central blue light fringe in a single slit diffraction pattern. The problem states that the distance across five fringes, including the central one, is 18mm, but the necessary variables for the calculation, such as the slit width and distance from the slit to the screen, are not provided. The correct approach emphasizes that the central fringe's width can be derived from the total distance of the five fringes, rather than needing the slit width or distance to the screen. Participants clarify that the central fringe is distinct and its width can be calculated without additional parameters. The focus remains on accurately determining the width of the central fringe based on the provided data.
aurao2003
Messages
122
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Hi

It is I again! Can someone please tell me where I went wrong? My answer is all over the place!



A narrow beam of light is directed normally at a single slit. The diffracted light forms a pattern on a white screen. A blue filter is placed in the path of the beam before it reaches the slit. The distance across five fringes including the central fringe is 18mm. Calculate the width of the central fringe




Homework Equations



Using W= (2 x wavelength x D)/a





The Attempt at a Solution


Solution:

Wavelength = 475nm (450-495 range)

D = 18mm

a= 5 (?)





I got 3.32nm!



Anybody?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
aurao2003 said:
A narrow beam of light is directed normally at a single slit. The diffracted light forms a pattern on a white screen. A blue filter is placed in the path of the beam before it reaches the slit. The distance across five fringes including the central fringe is 18mm. Calculate the width of the central fringe
[...]
Using W= (2 x wavelength x D)/a
That's the equation for the width of the central fringe, yes. But I don't think it's all that necessary for this problem.
Wavelength = 475nm (450-495 range)
That's a nice shade of blue. :smile:
D = 18mm
I think that D is the distance from the slit to the screen. That distance isn't given in the problem statement, but it turns out that you don't really need it for this problem.

[Edit: the 18 mm value is the distance spanning the central fringe plus 4 other fringes. You do need that for this problem. My original point is that the variable D is the distance from the slit to the screen, which is not necessary to know for this problem.]
a= 5 (?)
I think that a is the width of the slit. It's not given in the problem statement either, but it turns out that it's not necessary to solve this problem.
I got 3.32nm!
Something is not right! :eek:

Keep in mind the problem statement is asking for the width of the central fringe, not the width of the slit!

The problem gives you with width of the central fringe plus four other fringes.

Your job is to calculate the width of the central fringe, without the four other fringes.

The solution is pretty easy if you know basic characteristics of what the diffraction pattern looks like. (Hint: the trick is to realize that the central fringe is special compared to the other fringes. :wink:)
 
Last edited:
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top