What Is the Current in Seawater Under a Vertical B-Field?

  • Thread starter Thread starter NullSpace0
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Current Seawater
NullSpace0
Messages
25
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


This is Purcell 7.12. Seawater moves at 1 meter/second, there is a vertical B-field of .35 gauss, and the conductivity of water is .04 (1/ohm*cm). What is the current in Amps/meter/meter? If you moved water in a bottle at this speed, would there be a current induced?


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


I used E=(v/c)B since I know that the induced electric field comes from velocity and B-field which are perpendicular to one another... can you talk of induced electric fields like this?

Then I get E=(35/c) esu/cm^2. J=σE, so J=42.4 esu/sec/cm^2. This converts to 1.4e-4 Amps/m^2. Is that the right number?

I'm not sure how to answer the second part... why would it matter is the water is in a bottle or in a large body of water? All that matters it the conductivity and relative motion, so the current would flow, yes?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
NullSpace0 said:
why would it matter is the water is in a bottle or in a large body of water? All that matters it the conductivity and relative motion, so the current would flow, yes?
A current requires a circuit. Where's the return path in each case?
 
Presumably the current in the ocean would return at some point on the surface of the water or maybe below the surface of the water?

I guess for a bottle of water there would be no path for the current to return on, though.
 
NullSpace0 said:
Presumably the current in the ocean would return at some point on the surface of the water or maybe below the surface of the water?
Or even through the ocean floor.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top