What is the difference between probability and probability density?

ray.deng83
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Like the title, I don't quite understand what probability density is and its difference with probability. Can someone explain a bit on this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Probability density refers to probably per "area", used to represent probably of an event within a certain interval from a continuous distribution of events. Consider for example an event: randomly picking .50000... from a hat of all real numbers in [0,1]. What's the probability of this event? Zero; 1 in infinity numbers. But what is the probability of picking a number x, such that x<.5000..., from [0,1]. One half, of course. That's a probability density.

So, the radial distribution of the hydrogen atom 1s orbital
P(r) = 4\pi r^{2}\psi_{100}
gives a distribution of probabilties of finding an electron at a radius r. Probability is then
P=\int_{a}^{b}4\pi r^{2}\psi_{100} \,dr
on the radial interval [a,b].
 
Last edited:
blkqi said:
Probability density refers to probably per "area", used to represent probably of an event within a certain interval from a continuous distribution of events. Consider for example an event: randomly picking .50000... from a hat of all real numbers in [0,1]. What's the probability of this event? Zero; 1 in infinity numbers. But what is the probability of picking a number x, such that x<.5000..., from [0,1]. One half, of course. That's a probability density.

So, the radial distribution of the hydrogen atom 1s orbital
P(r) = 4\pi r^{2}\psi_{100}
gives a distribution of probabilties of finding an electron at a radius r. Probability is then
P=\int_{a}^{b}4\pi r^{2}\psi_{100} \,dr
on the radial interval [a,b].

So, probability can be used to describe an event within a discrete distribution which has finite entities and probability density is for an interval in a continuous system. This is because there are infinite entities in a continuous system and any probability of finding a specific one is zero and hence we have to use probability density to describe it.

In this sense, for that example, can we say the probability density of finding a number x, such that 0.3<x<0.5 from [0,1] is (0.5-0.3)/1?
 
ray.deng83 said:
In this sense, for that example, can we say the probability density of finding a number x, such that 0.3<x<0.5 from [0,1] is (0.5-0.3)/1?
Yes, because the distribution of decimals in [0,1] is uniform. In quantum mechanics we commonly deal with non-uniform wavefunctions.
 
Yes and that's why we need those distribution functions. Thanks for your help!
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
23
Views
1K
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
21
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Back
Top