What is the direction of work in this figure?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the confusion regarding the direction of work in a diagram involving pulleys and forces. The work done by a person lifting a mass is positive, as the force exerted aligns with the direction of displacement. However, the work done by the mass on the person is negative due to the opposing forces described by Newton's third law. Questions arise about the arrow indicating force direction, which seems contradictory to the tension force in the system. Overall, the diagram in question is criticized for being poorly constructed and potentially misleading.
patric44
Messages
308
Reaction score
40
Homework Statement
find the direction of work in this figure ?
Relevant Equations
w= F.d
iam not sure of the direction of work , is it positive becouse pulleys change the direction of the force ? or is it negative because of the arrow that indicates the direction of acceleration ??!
 

Attachments

  • tension.png
    tension.png
    680 bytes · Views: 327
Physics news on Phys.org
The work done by what force on what object? Your drawing does not look like a proper free-body diagram. A FBD should involve only one object and all of the external forces acting on this object.
 
the work done by the person to lift that mass , this diagram is an exact replica to the example
 

Attachments

  • uiyuy.png
    uiyuy.png
    940 bytes · Views: 301
patric44 said:
the work done by the person to lift that mass
There is no such thing. There is the "work done by the person on the mass". That work is positive because the force by the person on the mass (or rather, the rope) is in the same direction as the displacement when the mass is lifted. Then there is the "work done by the mass on the person", which would be the opposite because it is the same displacement but the force is the Newton 3 pair of the force of the person on the mass, i.e., it is equal in magnitude and opposite in direction.
 
Orodruin said:
There is no such thing. There is the "work done by the person on the mass". That work is positive because the force by the person on the mass (or rather, the rope) is in the same direction as the displacement when the mass is lifted. Then there is the "work done by the mass on the person", which would be the opposite because it is the same displacement but the force is the Newton 3 pair of the force of the person on the mass, i.e., it is equal in magnitude and opposite in direction.
so the person work on the mass is + , but i have a question here what is the arrow in front of the person indicates , its some how strange that its opposite to the tension force ? as if its indicating the acceleration of the system indicating a negative work or something ?!
 
patric44 said:
so the person work on the mass is + , but i have a question here what is the arrow in front of the person indicates , its some how strange that its opposite to the tension force ? as if its indicating the acceleration of the system indicating a negative work or something ?!
Tension in itself is not a force, it is technically a tensor that gives you a force depending on which object you are drawing the FBD for. If you are drawing the FBD for the person, then the force resulting from the tension is directed to the right (it is the tension in the rope multiplied by the direction of the rope away from the object you are drawing the FBD for). You should forget you ever saw that figure, it is a very bad figure that just seems designed to confuse.
 
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top