What is the distance and mass of a binary star system with given parameters?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the distance and masses of a binary star system using given parameters, including the apparent magnitude and spectral type of the primary star. Participants explore equations related to mass and luminosity, noting the importance of the spectral type in estimating the primary star's mass. There is uncertainty about whether the spectral type should be used in the solution, as it was not covered in lectures or textbooks. One participant suggests that the inclusion of spectral type implies it should be utilized, while another argues that extraneous information is often included in problem sets. The conversation highlights the challenges of applying theoretical knowledge to practical problems in astrophysics.
rockyleg
Messages
12
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


In an visual binary star system,the apparent magnitude of the primary star is m=9.8 and its spectrral type is G2V.The angular semi-major axis is φ=0''.1 and the period of the system is 24y.Find the distance of the system r and the two masses.The Sun's absolute magnitude is a given.(The luminance-mass relation ##L \propto M^{3.5}## is also known.)

Homework Equations


$$ M_1 +M_2 = \frac {A^3}{P^2}$$
$$ A= \frac{\phi}{\pi}$$

The Attempt at a Solution


$$ M-m=5-5logr $$
$$ M-M_{sun} = 2.5 log (\frac{L_{sun}}{L} = 3.5 x 2.5 log( \frac{M_{sun}}{M_1} ) ) $$
$$ \pi = \frac{1}{r}$$
And I'm stuck.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Can you use the spectral type to estimate the luminosity or mass of the primary star?
Otherwise I think you are missing one equation.

Your luminosity/mass relation equation looks odd.
 
Thanks for replying!
Well,according to wikipedia,the mass of a standard G2V star is 1.07 solar masses but I don't think this would be an accepted solution by the examiner since spectral types weren't mentioned in the lecture and there is no spectral type to mass index in the textbook.
I might use it anyway,though.
Thanks again!
 
rockyleg said:
I don't think this would be an accepted solution by the examiner since spectral types weren't mentioned in the lecture and there is no spectral type to mass index in the textbook
There's no point in having the question specify spectral type unless you are expected to use it somehow.
 
haruspex said:
There's no point in having the question specify spectral type unless you are expected to use it somehow.
Not really.It is common in this course's problem sets to be given information that isn't part of the solution.I would guess this is common in many places,is it not?
 
rockyleg said:
Not really.It is common in this course's problem sets to be given information that isn't part of the solution.I would guess this is common in many places,is it not?
It should be more common than it is.:frown:
 
  • Like
Likes mfb

Thread 'Errors and significant figures'

I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
View full post »
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'

Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'

In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
View full post »
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'

Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'

Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
View full post »

Similar threads

Binary system of stars (##\alpha## - centauri)
Replies
5
Views
2K
Combined magnitudes of two solar-type stars
Replies
6
Views
2K
Binary Stellar System: 15M⊙ & 10M⊙ Revisited
Replies
5
Views
1K
Centre of mass of binary system calculation
Replies
8
Views
2K
Kepler's 3rd law and a binary system
Replies
2
Views
2K
Binary Stars and Apparent Magnitudes
Replies
1
Views
2K
Find Absolute Magnitude, distance and "T" of binary star system
Replies
10
Views
2K
Finding the mass of a planet is a binary system
Replies
2
Views
5K
Binary Star Systems: Radial Velocities, Observations & Unresolved Eclipses
Replies
1
Views
2K
What is density of dark matter as a function of distance from the galactic core?
Replies
1
Views
883

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top