What Is the Dominant Product When an Alkene Reacts with H2 and Pt?

AI Thread Summary
When an alkene reacts with H2 in the presence of platinum (Pt), syn addition occurs, resulting in the addition of hydrogen atoms to the same face of the double bond. This process creates one chiral center, leading to two stereoisomers: one designated as S and the other as R. The reaction produces a racemic mixture due to the equal likelihood of hydrogen addition from either the top or bottom face of the alkene. Therefore, the dominant product is a racemic mixture of the two stereoisomers. This understanding is crucial for predicting the outcomes of alkene hydrogenation reactions.
Soaring Crane
Messages
461
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



An alkene


H---C=C---F
____|_|
___Cl__I

reacts with H2 in the presence of Pt. What will the dominant product be?



Homework Equations



See below.


The Attempt at a Solution



Syn addition will occur, so the hydrogen atoms will either be in the front or in the back. One chiral center will result. One product will be notated as S and the other as R; thus, a racemic mixture will form?

Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi
Yes it is syn addition and 2H be added on the same face.So addition can take place from the top or from the bottom 50% chances of each . This will give you equal amount of RS and hence racemic mixture.
Your answer is perfect.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top