What is the effect of a negative charge on the right hand rule?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion clarifies the application of the right hand rule in the context of negative charges in magnetic fields. It establishes that the direction of magnetic force on a negative charge is opposite to that of a positive charge. When a positive charge moves in a magnetic field, the right hand rule can be directly applied, while for a negative charge, the resulting force direction must be inverted. Examples illustrate that if a negative charge moves in a specific direction, the magnetic force and resulting circular motion will also reverse compared to a positive charge. Understanding this relationship is crucial for accurately predicting particle behavior in magnetic fields.
grscott_2000
Messages
48
Reaction score
0
Yesterday I asked a question regarding the right hand rule and Lorentz law. I now understand how the right hand rule is applied but the examples I have looked at all involve a positive charge.

My question is what effect does a negative charge have on the right hand rule?

If for example a positive charge is moving in a positive x direction when it enters a magnetic field and then starts to describe a circle in an anticlockwise direction (in the xy plane), by using the right hand rule I would say that the magnetic field would be in the positive z direction... Would you agree?

Now if a negative charge were to enter the same field and describes the same anticlockwise circle, how do I apply the right hand rule in this situation? Would I simple say, ok for a positive charge the direction of the magnetic field was in the z direction, so for a negative charge, the direction must be in the -z direction?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
grscott_2000 said:
My question is what effect does a negative charge have on the right hand rule?
The direction of magnetic force on a negative charge will be opposite to that on a positive charge.

If for example a positive charge is moving in a positive x direction when it enters a magnetic field and then starts to describe a circle in an anticlockwise direction (in the xy plane), by using the right hand rule I would say that the magnetic field would be in the positive z direction... Would you agree?
No. Using the right hand rule to compute \vec{F} = q\vec{v} \times \vec{B} for a postive charge moving in the +x direction in a magnetic field in the +z direction I get an initial force in the +y direction--which means clockwise circle. (Viewed from above the x-y plane, where z > 0.)

Now if a negative charge were to enter the same field and describes the same anticlockwise circle, how do I apply the right hand rule in this situation? Would I simple say, ok for a positive charge the direction of the magnetic field was in the z direction, so for a negative charge, the direction must be in the -z direction?
I think you have your directions mixed up in this case, but your idea is correct: To get the same direction of force on a negative charge, the magnetic field must be opposite to what it was for the positive charge.
 
if u got the direction right, u can say that it is just the opposite for the negative charge.

therefore 2nd answer is -z and 3rd answer is +z
 
Ok, I think I understand... So if we know any two of either magnetic force, magnetic field or charge, by using the right hand rule we can find the third.

If the charge is positive then that's fine we go with the direction on the right hand, but with a negative charge it is simply the opposite direction to the right hand?

Let me give one more example to see if I've got it...

A negative charged particle enters a magnetic field in the positive x direction and the magnetic field is in the -z direction, the particle would experience a magnetic force in the -y direction and would describe a circle in a clockwise direction?
 
grscott_2000 said:
If the charge is positive then that's fine we go with the direction on the right hand, but with a negative charge it is simply the opposite direction to the right hand?
Exactly.

Let me give one more example to see if I've got it...

A negative charged particle enters a magnetic field in the positive x direction and the magnetic field is in the -z direction, the particle would experience a magnetic force in the -y direction and would describe a circle in a clockwise direction?
You got it.
 
Now apply Quantum wave observations to the particle in motion ^^

Tingle, brain! Tingle! >.<
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top