What is the Effect of the Number Operator on a Given Wavefunction?

doggydan42
Messages
169
Reaction score
18

Homework Statement


Consider the state
$$\psi_\alpha = Ne^{\alpha \hat a^\dagger}\phi_0, $$
where ##\alpha## can be complex, and ##N = e^{-\frac{1}{2}|\alpha|^2}## normalizes ##\psi_\alpha##.

Find ##\hat N \psi_\alpha##.

Homework Equations


$$\hat N = \hat a^\dagger \hat a$$
$$\hat a\phi_n = \sqrt{n}\phi_{n-1}$$
$$\hat a^\dagger = \sqrt{n+1}\phi_{n+1}$$
$$\hat a \psi_\alpha = \alpha \psi_\alpha$$
$$\phi_n = \frac{1}{\sqrt{n!}}(\hat a^\dagger)^n \phi_0$$

The Attempt at a Solution


First applying ##\hat a## gives
$$\hat N \psi_\alpha = \hat a ^\dagger \alpha \psi_\alpha$$
Expanding the exponential gives
$$\alpha N \sum_{n=0}^\infty \frac{\alpha^n}{n!}(\hat a ^\dagger)^{n+1}\phi_0 = N \sum_{n=0}^\infty \frac{\alpha^{n+1}}{n!}(\hat a ^\dagger)^{n+1}\phi_0 = N \sum_{n=1}^\infty \frac{\alpha^{n}}{(n-1)!}(\hat a ^\dagger)^{n}\phi_0 = N \sum_{n=1}^\infty \frac{\alpha^{n}}{n!}n(\hat a ^\dagger)^{n}\phi_0$$

Because at n = 0 the sum becomes 0,
$$\hat N \psi_\alpha = N \sum_{n=0}^\infty \frac{\alpha^{n}}{n!}n(\hat a ^\dagger)^{n}\phi_0$$

From here, I am unsure of how to simplify the summation.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There's several typos or errors in the Relevant equations part... I also think that the commutator of ##\hat{a}## and ##\hat{a}^\dagger## may be needed in this problem.

Also, note that ##\frac{1}{n!} = \frac{1}{\sqrt{n!}\sqrt{n!}}##, which allows you to convert the ##\phi_0## in the last equation to ##\phi_n##.
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top