What is the effect on the Berry phase?

  • Thread starter Thread starter jeon3133
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Berry phase Phase
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the Berry phase in quantum mechanics, specifically examining how the Berry phase γn[C] is affected when a Hamiltonian H[s] is modified by multiplying it with a function f[s]. Participants are exploring the implications of this modification on the Berry phase for a closed curve C.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster seeks assistance in understanding the effect of modifying the Hamiltonian on the Berry phase. Some participants inquire about the definition of the Berry phase and its relation to the closed curve, questioning whether the curve is fixed or arbitrary. Others raise points about the significance of the Hamiltonian being slowly varying and its implications in the context of the Aharonov-Bohm effect.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants asking clarifying questions and exploring different interpretations of the problem. There is no explicit consensus yet, but the dialogue indicates a productive examination of the concepts involved.

Contextual Notes

Participants are considering the nature of the parameters involved and the implications of the Hamiltonian's modification. The discussion includes assumptions about the closed curve and the conditions under which the Berry phase is evaluated.

jeon3133
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
No Effort: Member warned that some effort must be shown on homework questions
Homework Statement
Consider a Hamiltonian H[s] that depends on a number of slowly varying parameters collectively called s(t). What is the effect on the Berry phase γn[C] for a given closed curve C, if H[s] is replaced with f[s] H[s], where f[s] is an arbitrary real numerical function of the s?
Relevant Equations
.
Homework Statement :
Consider a Hamiltonian H[s ] that depends on a number of slowly varying parameters collectively called s(t). What is the effect on the Berry phase γn[C] for a given closed curve C, if H[s ] is replaced with f[s ] H[s ], where f[s ] is an arbitrary real numerical function of the s?Homework Equations :
For any s, we can find a complete orthonormal set of eigenstates Φn of H with eigenvalues En(s):
n = EnΦn
n, Φm) = δnm
.Attempt at a Solution :
Could you help me to solve this problem?
Please...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Do you know the equation for the Berry phase?
 
In the special case where i and j run over three values,
γn[C] = ∫∫A[C] dA e[s ] ⋅ Vn[s ], ----- (1)
where e[s ] is the unit vector normal to the surface A[C] at the point s, and Vn[s ] is a three-vector in parameter space:
Vn[s ] ≡ i m≠n{(Φn[s ], [∇H [s ]] Φm[s ])* × (Φn[s ], [∇H [s ]] Φm[s ])} × (Em[s ] - En[s ])-2.
 
I don't understand. Is the closed curve given or is it arbitrary? In the Aharonov-Bohm effect, do you not get different answers if your integration encloses or doesn't enclose the solenoid?

Why do you think that you are told the function is slowly varying?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K