What is the electric field at a point 4 cm from the axis of a cylindrical shell?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the electric field at a point 4 cm from the axis of a cylindrical shell with a given charge density. The electric field intensity at a point 23 cm from the axis is provided as 44800 N/C, and the relevant equation for the electric field is mentioned. The original poster expresses confusion and frustration after attempting multiple problems, leading to a moment of exhaustion. Responses emphasize the importance of making a solid attempt before seeking help, while also noting that most forum participants are polite. The conversation highlights the challenges of problem-solving in physics and the dynamics of online academic support.
pcml100
Messages
23
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A cylindrical shell of radius 9.9 cm and length 286 cm has its charge density uniformly distributed on its surface. The electric field intensity at a point 23 cm radially outward from its axis (measured from the midpoint of the shell ) is 44800 N/C.
Given: ke = 8.99 × 10^9 N · m^2/C^2,

What is the electric field at a point 4 cm from
the axis?

Homework Equations



E = (Keq)/r2

The Attempt at a Solution



I kind of don't even know where to start
 
Physics news on Phys.org
First get hold of some good book and clarify the theory part. Then think of attempting the problem.
 
Thanks for your incredibly helpful and polite answer Einstein. I figured it out, it just confused me because I had done around 15 problems by the time I got to this one so I was exhausted. This forum has some really stuck up people if I may say so...
 
you may say so...
I didnt mean to be 'impolite'. So i do apologize!

pcml100 said:
I kind of don't even know where to start
[/b]
But next time before posting a problem, try it out at least an hour, and give a decent attempt to the solution. The mentors will help you to figure out where you have done a mistake, or where you are stuck!
 
pcml100 said:
Thanks for your incredibly helpful and polite answer Einstein. I figured it out, it just confused me because I had done around 15 problems by the time I got to this one so I was exhausted. This forum has some really stuck up people if I may say so...
However, Most people who post questions asking for help are actually polite. A few are not so polite.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top