What is the Electric Field at Point P?

AI Thread Summary
To find the electric field at Point P, the individual fields from two charges must be calculated and combined. The contributor initially calculated the electric fields from a 5.6 µC charge as 5,040,000 N/C and from a -3.6 µC charge as -9,000,000 N/C, resulting in a total of -3,960,000 N/C. However, the correct answer is 7.20 x 10^6 N/C at an angle of 56 degrees north of east. The discussion emphasizes the importance of breaking down electric fields into their vector components to accurately add them. Ultimately, understanding vector components is crucial for solving such problems effectively.
RonakPat
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



What is the electric field at Point P shown below?
http://img685.imageshack.us/img685/2268/58580322.png

Homework Equations



<br /> \begin{flalign*}<br /> E &amp; = &amp; &amp; k \ \frac{q}{r^2} \ \mbox{ or } \ \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_0} \ \frac{q}{r^2}\\<br /> V &amp; = &amp; &amp; k \ \frac{q}{r} \ \mbox{ or } \ \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_0} \ \frac{q}{r}\\<br /> \end{flalign*}<br />


The Attempt at a Solution



I figured that to find the electric field acting on point P, I would have to add the two separate fields from the charges.

Using the equation above, i got these answers
for the 5.6 uC I got 5,040,000 N/C
and for the -3.6 uC I got -9,000,000 N/C

and then I added them to get -3,960,000 N/C.

Maybe my thinking was wrong but, the answers my teacher gave me say that the answer to this problem is 7.20 x 106 and the angle is 56degrees N of E.

I also have no idea how to find the angle. My only thought is taking the inverse tangent?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Break the problem up completely into vectors and tell me each of the vectors you got. The only way you're going to get the answer is by adding vector components, and not the vector resultants.
 
I don't see how you can make vectors out of fields =\ my teacher says the solution doesn't have anything to do with vectors.
 
Electric fields are inherently vectors. They are easy vectors to work with, and maybe that is why he says the solution has nothing to do with vectors. The simple fact of the matter is that you have one field making a contribution in one direction, and another making a contribution in a different direction. You have to know how to correctly add them. In geometrical terms, you simply can't add/subtract the hypotenuse and leg of triangles together.
 
Break each electric field into its x and y components. Add the two x components and the two y components. You'll get the resultant x component and the resultant y component.

This may seem to have nothing to do with vectors, but a vector IS a pair of components. The usefulness of breaking a quantity down into its components and adding components was why vectors were invented in the first place.
 
Thanks everyone! I got the answer! Ill just try to break every problem like this into components.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Back
Top