What is the energy balance for a Bernoulli's equation problem?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on solving a Bernoulli's equation problem, focusing on energy balance calculations. Part A involves determining mass flow rates and densities, with the final mass flow rate calculated as 7.128 kg/s. In Part B, the energy equation is set up using specific heat and velocity terms, leading to an initial calculation of W_dot_out as -118 kJ/s, which translates to W_dot_in of 118 kW. However, there is confusion regarding the expected answer, which should be around 223 kW, prompting participants to verify their calculations. The discrepancy in the expected answer highlights potential errors in the problem's setup or interpretation.
pyroknife
Messages
611
Reaction score
4
Part a is pretty easy

m'1+m'2=m'3
m'=mass flow rates
density1*velocity1*Area1+(analogous terms for inlet 2)=(analogous terms for inlet 3)
The 3 densities are unknown
but can be found from equation pressure/(RT)
R=286.9 J/(kgk)

This gives:
density 1=1.66 kg/m^3
density 2=1.432kg/m^3
density 3=2.35 kg/m^3

solving for mass flow rate gives 7.128 kg/s





not for part B our professor told us to use the equation
Q_dot_in - W_dot_out = m_dot_3 (cp T3 + V3^2/2 + gx3) - (analogous terms for 2) - (analogous terms for 1)

cp=specific heat =1004 J/kgK
h=cpT so that's where those terms came from

V1=Q1/A1
V2=Q2/A2
V3=Q3/A3

Where Q=volume flow rate given in the problem
this gives:
v1=86.61 m/s
v2=66.1m/s
v3=33.41 m/s

The equation also requires mass flow rates
mass flow rate = density*Q or density*velocity*area
m'1=4.98 kg/s
m'2=2.15 kg/s
m'3=7.128 kg/s

Now we have all the unknowns and the energy equation becomes
67-W_dot_out = 7.128 (1004*311+33.41^2 / 2 + 9.81*.5) - 2.15(1004*365 + .5*66.1^2+9.81*0.5) - 4.98(1004*294+.5*86.615^2+9.81*0)
W_dot_out = -118 kJ/s



W_dot_in = 118 kW
However the answer is supposed to be 223 kW or something like that.
I checked our my answer a few times and haven't found any mistakes. Can you guys check?
 

Attachments

  • Untitled.png
    Untitled.png
    18.2 KB · Views: 512
Physics news on Phys.org
Hmmmm odd. Is the "correct" answer given in the back of the book or given by your professor? I too came up with 118kW.
 
Sorry, never mind, he just told us it was the wrong answer. UGHhhh
 

Similar threads

Back
Top