What is the energy of the following state (quantum square)?

spaghettibretty
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


[/B]
What is the energy of an STM tunneling electron in the following state? This "quantum square" model can be seen as a "particle in a 2-D box" problem.
<Refer to the picture below>
The protrusions are Fe atoms and the surface is Cu(111).
Given that the radius of an Fe atom is 126 pm (1.26e-10 m), I've calculated that the shorter side, Lx, equals 2.02e-10 m. Likewise, the longer side, Ly equals 2.77e-10 m.

Lx = 2.02e-10 m
Ly = 2.77e-10 m
h = Planck's constant = 6.626e-34 J*s
m = effective mass of an electron in this scenario = 0.38me = 0.38 * 9.109e-31 kg = 3.461e-31 kg

Jy6Ory4.png

Homework Equations



E = n^2 * h^2 / (8*m*L^2)
Ex, y = nx^2 * h^2 / (8 * m * Lx^2) + ny^2 * h^2 / (8 * m * Ly^2)

The Attempt at a Solution


[/B]
All I need to know are the constants, nx and ny, the rest of the problem would just be a plug and chug. Although, I don't think the number of Fe atoms represent the n constants. I believe that the number of nodes + 1 would give me the values I need, but I'm not quite sure what in this picture represents the nodes. Do the black dots in the square represent the nodes? Or do they represent the actual n values? If they represented the n values, would nx = 3 and would ny = 4?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Thanks for the post! Sorry you aren't generating responses at the moment. Do you have any further information, come to any new conclusions or is it possible to reword the post?
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top