What is the energy of the most intense gamma peak?

says
Messages
585
Reaction score
12
Handgun ammunition contains Ba and Sb compounds. Firing a handgun leaves residues of these elements in microgram quantities on the back of ones hand. Such quantities are 1000 times above the detection threshold for neutron activation analysis for Ba and Sb. Assuming a swab is taken from the back of a suspects hand:

If analysed via slow neutron activation, determine which isotope of Sb is likely to be created. Then, consult the National Nuclear Data Centre (http://www.nndc.bnl.gov/nudat2/) and determine the gamma radiation that will be emitted.

What is the energy of the most intense gamma peak? (in keV)
(assume the original target nuclei are those which are naturally most abundant)

121Sb is the most abundant isotope of Sb, so I assume that is the target nuclei. If we are analyzing it via neutron activation that would add 1 neutron to it's mass number, making it 122Sb

I have the decay radiation information for 122Sb here: http://www.nndc.bnl.gov/nudat2/decaysearchdirect.jsp?nuc=122SB&unc=nds

I'm not really sure what I'm looking for on the page though. I believe the answer is 564.24 keV, with an intensity of 70.67 %.

I also found this image from a neutron activation experiment that supports this:
https://carlwillis.files.wordpress.com/2011/09/sb_activation.jpg
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top