What is the formula for the 3D trajectory of a curving ball?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mariokan
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ball Trajectory
AI Thread Summary
The trajectory of a curving ball in 3D is a complex problem rooted in fluid dynamics, lacking a straightforward formula. There are no pre-existing equations that apply universally to every scenario, making it necessary to approach the problem by breaking it down into its x, y, and z components. Numeric solutions may be generated for simplified cases, but a closed-form solution is unlikely. Additional information about the ball's initial conditions, such as whether it starts from rest or is in motion, is essential for further analysis. Overall, the intricacies of the problem require a detailed understanding of projectile motion and related physics.
mariokan
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hello.
Does anybody knows the formula for trajectory of curving ball (in 3D).
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Sorry Physics doesn't work that way. There is no store of "equations" on the shelf waiting for each and every situation.

We can say that it is a difficult problem of fluid dynamics. You could possibly generate numeric solutions to simplified versions of the problem. But there will be no closed form solution. It is not clear to me that there can even be a "simple" functional description of the general case.
 
You'd definitely have to begin by splitting the problem into its x, y and z components and working from there. Think about projectile motion, etc. Anyway, you haven't given us enough info. Does it start from rest, is it moving, accelerating?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top