What is the gravitational field of a flat disc?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the gravitational field of a flat disc with constant density in the z=0 plane. The potential function derived is correct, but the resulting gravitational field indicates a force at z=0, which seems contradictory. It is clarified that the potential must be symmetric about the disk, leading to a revised potential function. The force per unit mass shows discontinuity at z=0, where the force is effectively zero, indicating a need for separate consideration of this case. The discussion emphasizes the importance of proper integration and understanding of the gravitational field's behavior near the disc's center.
speg
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
Hey guys, so I'm back in school after an 8-month break, and I'm feeling a bit rusty :rolleyes:

So I've got a flat disc of radius A, with constant density p, in the z=0 plane. I want to calculate the gravitational field at any point up or down the z-axis.

I integrated the potential over the disc got the correct potential function (which is given) of :

\Phi(z)=-G\rho2\pi(\sqrt{a^2+z^2}-z)
So now I just take the negative derivative of this to get the Gravitational field, right?
G(z)=-\nabla\Phi(z)
G(z)=-G\rho2\pi(\frac{z}{\sqrt{a^2+z^2}}-1)

But this means there is a force at z=0 when I think there should not be... :confused:

How do I make a new line in Latex? \\ this doesn't seem to work? :@
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
speg said:
So I've got a flat disc of radius A, with constant density p, in the z=0 plane. I want to calculate the gravitational field at any point up or down the z-axis.

I integrated the potential over the disc got the correct potential function (which is given) of :

\Phi(z)=-G\rho2\pi(\sqrt{a^2+z^2}-z)
So now I just take the negative derivative of this to get the Gravitational field, right?
G(z)=-\nabla\Phi(z)
G(z)=-G\rho2\pi(\frac{z}{\sqrt{a^2+z^2}}-1)

But this means there is a force at z=0 when I think there should not be...
What is the thickness of the disc? Where does that appear in your calculation?

The force/unit mass at (0,0,z) from a ring element of the disc of radius r thickness h and width dr would be:

dF = Gdm/s^2 = \frac{G\rho 2\pi r hdr}{r^2 + z^2}

assuming h to be small compared to z. Integrate that from r = 0 to r = A.

AM
 
Last edited:
The potential is not correct, since it is not symmetric about the disk.
The proper potential is:
\Phi(z)=-G2\pi\rho(\sqrt{a^{2}+z^{2}}-|z|)
yielding the proper force per unit mass along the z-axis (in the positive vertical direction) :
f(z)=2\pi\rho{G}(\frac{z}{\sqrt{a^{2}+z^{2}}}-\frac{z}{|z|})
The limiting values as z goes to zero,
\lim_{z\to{0}^{+}}f(z)=-2\pi\rho{G}, \lim_{z\to{0}^{-}}f(z)=2\pi\rho{G}
are the strengths of the force just outside the disk, on either side.
There is a leap of discontinuity across the disk, where AT the origin, the force is, indeed 0.
 
Last edited:
\frac{d|z|}{dz}=\frac{z}{|z|}?
 
speg said:
\frac{d|z|}{dz}=\frac{z}{|z|}?
Quite so. :smile:
The derivative of the absolute value function is not defined at z=0.
 
And so F cannot be defined at z=0? So we take that to mean there is no force there?
 
speg said:
And so F cannot be defined at z=0? So we take that to mean there is no force there?
No, it doesn't. It just means you have to consider the z=0 case separately.
 
Back
Top