What is the Gravitational Potential Energy of a Toy in a Swing?

  • Thread starter Thread starter stanton
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Energy
stanton
Messages
74
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A 40 N toy is placed in a light swing that is attached to ropes 2.0m long. Find the gravitational potential energy associated with the toy relative to its lowest position when (a) the ropes are horizontal (b) the ropes make a 30 degrees angle with the vertical and (c) at the bottom of the circular arc.

Homework Equations



PEg = mgy (note: y is distance)
Wg = -mg(yf-yi)=mgyi-mgyf=PEi-PEf
Wg=-deltaPE

The Attempt at a Solution



I do not know what to start. Well, as my prop show a similar problem with (b) problem, I tried to draw free body diagram. like vertical = y-axis and horizontal = x axis. So the the rope and y-axis makes a sort of triangle. and the unknown length of the one side of triangle must be length of cord multiplied by cos30. And I cant' go further. Maybe I went down all wrong. Will you help?
If I am asked solve the length between the maximum point reached by toy or something like that, I think I can do it. However, about energy, I am confused.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
As usual I'd begin by drawing a picture!:wink:

What is the minimum potential energy of the toy?
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top