What is the implicit equation for a plane perpendicular to a line?

  • Thread starter Thread starter shards5
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Implicit Plane
shards5
Messages
37
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


An implicit equation for the plane passing through the point (-2,5,-5) that is perpendicular to the line L(t) = <5+2t,3,4> is ...?

Homework Equations



a(x-x0) + b(y-y0) + c(z-z0) = 0

The Attempt at a Solution


So in order to find the equation of the plane I would need a normal vector and I got that using the following steps:
Find a point on the line: L(1) = <7, 3, 4>
Get a vector from the given point to the newly found point. (7,3,4) - (-2,5,-5) = (9,-2,9)
Find the normal direction of the line: <2,0,0>
Use the cross product to find the normal vector. (9,-2,9) x <2,0,0> = <0,18,4>
Therefore I have the equation: 18(y-5) + 4(z+5) = 0, but this is wrong. What am I doing wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
shards5 said:

Homework Statement


An implicit equation for the plane passing through the point (-2,5,-5) that is perpendicular to the line L(t) = <5+2t,3,4> is ...?

Homework Equations



a(x-x0) + b(y-y0) + c(z-z0) = 0

The Attempt at a Solution


So in order to find the equation of the plane I would need a normal vector and I got that using the following steps:
Find a point on the line: L(1) = <7, 3, 4>
Get a vector from the given point to the newly found point. (7,3,4) - (-2,5,-5) = (9,-2,9)
Find the normal direction of the line: <2,0,0>
Use the cross product to find the normal vector. (9,-2,9) x <2,0,0> = <0,18,4>
Therefore I have the equation: 18(y-5) + 4(z+5) = 0, but this is wrong. What am I doing wrong?

Your normal is correct, <2, 0, 0>, which you can read directly from the equation of the line. The numbers in the normal are the coefficients of t, which are 2, 0, and 0.

Once you have a normal <A, B, C> to the plane, and you know a point (a, b, c) on the plane, the equation of the plane is A(x -a) + B(y - b) + C(z - c) = 0.

Calculating the cross product is a waste of time, since you already have a normal to the plane, namely <2, 0, 0>.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top