How Is Induced Current Calculated in a Moving Bar Near a Wire?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the induced current in a moving bar near a vertical wire carrying a steady current of 17 A. The setup involves a pair of horizontal rails spaced 0.2 m apart, with a 7.6 Ω resistor connecting them, and the bar moves at a constant velocity of 0.5 m/s. The magnetic field generated by the wire is calculated to be 1.7 *10^-5 T, leading to an induced emf of 1.53 *10^-6 V. The induced current is then found to be 0.201 μA, but confusion arises regarding the magnetic flux and its perpendicularity to the rectangle formed by the bar and rails. Clarification is sought on the setup and the magnetic field's influence on the induced current.
Lizziecupcake
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Problem: A long vertical wire carries a steady 17 A current. A pair of rails are horizontal and are 0.2 m apart. A 7.6 Ω resistor connects points a and b, at the end of the rails. A bar is in contact with the rails, and is moved by an external force with a constant velocity of 0.5 m/s as shown. The bar and the rails have negligible resistance. At a given instant t1, the bar is 0.18 m from the wire, as shown. In Figure, at time t1, the induced current in µA is:
Express the answer in three decimal places.

My attempt at the question:
Current in the wire, i = 17 A
Distance between the rails, d = 0.20 m
Resistance, R = 7.6 Ω
Velocity , v = 0.50 m/s
At time t1, the bar is 0.18 m from the wire

B = μ0 i / 2 π d
= (4 π *10-7 T.m/A) (17 A) / 2π (0.20 m)
B = 1.7 *10-5 T
------------------------------------------------------
Induced emf , ε = dφ / dt
= B L v
= (1.7 *10-5 T) (0.18 m) (0.50 m/s)
= 1.53 *10-6 V
-----------------------------------------------------------
Induced current, I = ε / R
= (1.53 *10-6 V) / (7.6 Ω)
= 2.01 *10-7 A
= 0.201 μ A

It seems to be wrong so I don't exactly know what I'm doing wrong so could someone help me out?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm still trying to get my head round the set-up. It sounds as though the bar, rails and resistor make a rectangle which is perpendicular to the vertical wire with steady current. Is this right? But in this case, the vertical wire would create a magnetic field which is not perpendicular to the rectangle. So the magnetic flux would be zero, at all times... But it seems unlikely that the answer would just be zero, so I think I have misunderstood the set-up somehow.
 
cupcake, you said some figure is there. figure will help
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Back
Top