What Is the Intensity Distribution and Resolving Power of an N-Slit Grating?

unscientific
Messages
1,728
Reaction score
13

Homework Statement



2zxpbhx.png


Part (a): Find intensity distribution of N-slit grating
Part (b): Find resolving power
Part (c): Find an expression for Bandpass, and estimate its value. What value of slit width gives same bandpass as resolving power theoretically?

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution



I've solved most parts of the question, except the very last part in part (c). I thought the bandpass is independent of wavelength?Part(a)

I = I_0 \frac{sin^2(\frac{Nkd sin \theta}{2})}{sin^2 \frac{kd sin \theta}{2}} sinc^2 (\frac{ka sin \theta}{2})

Part (b)

Width from central maxima to first minimum ## \Delta \theta = \frac{1}{N}(\frac{\lambda}{d})##

For pth order fringe maximum: ## sin \theta_{max} = \frac{p\lambda}{d}##, I get angular dispersion as ##\frac{d\theta}{d\lambda} = \frac{p}{d cos \theta} \approx \frac{p}{d}##.

Thus, Resolving Power ##\frac{\lambda}{\Delta \lambda} = \frac{\lambda}{\Delta \theta / \frac{d\theta}{d\lambda}} = Np = N## for p = 1.

Part (c)

Bandpass is defined as the amount of lambda it let's through, so Bandpass is:
\frac{d\lambda}{d\theta} \Delta \theta
= \frac{d\lambda}{d\theta} \frac{w}{f}

Where w is exit path width and f is focal length.

I found bandpass = ##5.56 * 10^{-5} m##

Now for the last part, theoretically for first order resolving power is independent of λ?

Resolving power = N

\frac{wd}{f} = N
w = 3*10^{11} m

This answer seems ridiculous.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
bumpp
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top