What is the kinetic energy of the block when it is moved 2cm.

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the kinetic energy of a block influenced by spring force, tension, and friction. The user initially struggles with the concept of using the combined mass of two blocks in the kinetic energy equation, as opposed to just the sliding block. It is clarified that considering both blocks as a system simplifies the analysis, as the tension force becomes internal and does not contribute to net work. Additionally, there is a correction regarding the units of work and energy, emphasizing that work should be expressed in Joules rather than Newtons. The explanation concludes with an illustration of how the tension does zero net work on the system due to its opposing effects on both blocks.
Shivam
Messages
32
Reaction score
2
Homework Statement
Given that M=20kg, the force constant k=10kN/m, the frictional force is 80N and the system is held at rest with l=l°+10cm and then released, l° is the unstreched length of the spring.then
a) What is the kinetic energy of the block when it is moved 2cm from its point of release.
Relevant Equations
Work done by all the forces on a particle = change in its kinetic energy.
246530


My attempt at the solution...
I only have problem in solving part a)

1) i calculated the spring force actingbon the table block and it is greater than the frictionnand tension force acting in the opposite direction, so by that the block will move in left.
2) now i found that which forces are acting on the particle which are spring force, tension, and friction
3) I calculated work done by friction = -1.6N, work done by tension= -8N
And final spring potential energy=32N.mand intial spring potential energy= 50N.m
4) i equated all these values to the equation-

Wf+Wt=∆k+∆U

{Where Wf= work done by friction
Wt= work done by tension
∆U= change in potential energy due to spring
∆k= change in kenetic energy of block on table}

Now the only thing that is I can't understand that
In kinetic energy it took it = 1/2MV² where as you can see in the posted image at the lastline they took it equal to= 1/2(M+2M)V², why they took both mass when we are calculating work done on Block on the table, the work done by hanging blocknis delived through tension force.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The solution considers a system consisting of both blocks. Then the mass of the "system" is the sum of the masses of the two blocks. You propose to use only the sliding block as your system. That's OK, but you need to understand that the tension is not constant because the block is accelerating and in fact undergoes damped harmonic motion of sorts. So the work done by the tension is a rather complicated proposition. The advantage of using both blocks as the system is that the tension becomes an internal force that does zero net work and you don't have to worry about it.

Also, what do you mean by this
Shivam said:
3) I calculated work done by friction = -1.6N, work done by tension= -8N
And final spring potential energy=32N.mand initial spring potential energy= 50N.m
Work has units of Joules, not Newtons and so does potential energy. The unit N##\cdot##m is dimensionally correct for energy but is normally reserved for torque. I know that's what your solution sheet uses but I respectfully disagree with it.
 
  • Like
Likes Shivam
kuruman said:
The solution considers a system consisting of both blocks. Then the mass of the "system" is the sum of the masses of the two blocks. You propose to use only the sliding block as your system. That's OK, but you need to understand that the tension is not constant because the block is accelerating and in fact undergoes damped harmonic motion of sorts. So the work done by the tension is a rather complicated proposition. The advantage of using both blocks as the system is that the tension becomes an internal force that does zero net work and you don't have to worry about it.

Also, what do you mean by this

Work has units of Joules, not Newtons and so does potential energy. The unit N##\cdot##m is dimensionally correct for energy but is normally reserved for torque. I know that's what your solution sheet uses but I respectfully disagree with it.
First i am sorry for writing wrong Units and thanks for the torque units and also for telling me about the tension will be variable.. can you lastly tell me how tension will have zero work as internally, if you explainna little bit..
 
Shivam said:
First i am sorry for writing wrong Units and thanks for the torque units and also for telling me about the tension will be variable.. can you lastly tell me how tension will have zero work as internally, if you explainna little bit..
It's really simple. For an ideal pulley the tension acting on each block will have the same magnitude ##T## at all times. If the hanging block moves up by ##ds## the tension does positive work ##T~ds## on it because the tension and the displacement are in the same direction. Meanwhile the other block moves to the left by ##ds## which is in a direction opposite to the tension. Therefore the tension does negative work ##-T~ds## on the sliding block. Thus, the net work done by tension on the two-block system is zero. This result is a direct consequence of Newton's 3rd law.
 
  • Like
Likes Shivam and jim mcnamara
Beams of electrons and protons move parallel to each other in the same direction. They ______. a. attract each other. b. repel each other. c. neither attract nor repel. d. the force of attraction or repulsion depends upon the speed of the beams. This is a previous-year-question of CBSE Board 2023. The answer key marks (b) as the right option. I want to know why we are ignoring Coulomb's force?
Thread 'Struggling to make relation between elastic force and height'
Hello guys this is what I tried so far. I used the UTS to calculate the force it needs when the rope tears. My idea was to make a relationship/ function that would give me the force depending on height. Yeah i couldnt find a way to solve it. I also thought about how I could use hooks law (how it was given to me in my script) with the thought of instead of having two part of a rope id have one singular rope from the middle to the top where I could find the difference in height. But the...