What Is the Lowest Coefficient of Static Friction for a Log?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Supernerd2004
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Equilibrium Log
AI Thread Summary
To determine the lowest coefficient of static friction necessary to prevent an 800N log from slipping, torque and force equations were established. The calculations involved finding the vertical and horizontal components of tension, leading to the normal force being 446.17N. The force of friction was set equal to the horizontal tension component, resulting in a coefficient of friction of 1.01. The calculations were confirmed by another participant, indicating consistency in the results. Further assistance was requested to verify the calculations.
Supernerd2004
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
A log weighs 800N and has its center of gravity at the midpoint. Find the lowest coefficient of static friction necessary to keep the log from slipping.

Answer (1.01)

http://img115.imageshack.us/img115/8407/physicsproblem3ox.th.png

Ok, so, i started out by finding my torque and force equations.
Torque = (800)*(3.5)*(cos(25)) = (Tv)*(6.5)*(cos(25)) + (Th)*(6.5)*(sin(25))

Normal Force = (800) - (Tv)

Force of Friction = (Normal Force) (Coefficient of Friction)

Force of Friction = (Th)

tan(25) = (Th)/(Tv)

So, solving for (Th) I got...
(Th) = tan(25)/Tv

So, Torque = (800)*(3.5)*cos(25) = (Tv)*(6.5)*cos(25) + (tan(25)/(Tv))*(sin(25))

Where (Tv) is the vertical component of the tension and (Th) is the horizontal component of tension.

Solving for (Tv) I get (Tv) = 353.83
Solving for (Th) (Th) = tan(25)(353.83) = 164.99

If Normal Force = Weight - (Tv) then N = 800 - 353.83 = 446.17

so (Normal Force)(Coefficient of Friction) = (Th)
Then (446.17)(Coe. of Friction) = 164.17
The coe. of friction is not equal to 1.01

Any help as to where I went wrong would be much appreciated! Thanks so much in advance for any help!

Dan
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
hmm, i don't claim to be a physics pro but the coeff i calculated is the same as yours. Maybe someone want to come in and help?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top