What is the Lowest Energy State of a Simple Harmonic Oscillator?

fredrick08
Messages
374
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The wave function \Psi(x,t) ofr the lowest energy state of simple harmonic oscillator, consisting of a particle mass m acted on by a linear restoring force F=Cx, where C is the force constant, can be expressed as..
\Psi(x,t)=Aexp[-(\sqrt{}Cm/2h)x^{}2-(i/2)(\sqrt{}C/m)t] where A is constant.

a. use the Hamiltonian operator with V(x)=.5x^{}2, to evaluate the total energy of the state!


Homework Equations


Hop(x)=(P^{}2op/2m)+V(x)
Hop(t)=i*hbar(d/dt)
P^{}2op=-hbar^{}2d^{}2/dx^{}2

The Attempt at a Solution


ok i am very confused as to which operqator to use, since my wave function is not time independent, but they give me V(x) value...
but to find to total energy all u do is multiply the operator by wave function i think.

can i ask which op do i use?? and is it just multiplying them together?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
they should give the same answer as its the same state!

but seeing as it says in the question to use the Hamiltonian with V(x)=\frac{1}{2}x^2, i'd use the first one you wrote down seeing as it has a V(x) term in it.
 
ok thanks
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top