What is the magnitude E of the field?

  • Thread starter Thread starter phyxstdt
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Field Magnitude
phyxstdt
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement




Two tiny spheres of mass = 7.20 mg carry charges of equal magnitude, 72.0 nC , but opposite sign. They are tied to the same ceiling hook by light strings of length 0.530 m . When a horizontal uniform electric field E that is directed to the left is turned on, the spheres hang at rest with the angle between the strings equal to 50.0 degrees.

What is the magnitude E of the field?


Homework Equations


Fe1 = Eq
Fe2 = (Kq1q2)/r2
Fg = mg



The Attempt at a Solution



I assumed that the state it is in is in equilibrium so I set up:

ƩF = Fg + Fe1 + Fe2 + T = 0

ƩTx = Tcosθ - Fe1 + Fe2 = 0

θ being 65 degrees since I split the triangle made by the 50 degrees into 2 right triangles.

ƩTy = Tsinθ - mg = 0

T = (Fe1 - Fe2)/cosθ

Ty = (Fe1 - Fe2)tanθ - mg = 0

Fe1 = mg/tanθ + Fe2

E = (mg/tanθ + kq1q2/r2)/q

(I found r to be .448 using the right triangles I formed)

I plugged in all the given values and I've got...1.17 x 10^6

Which is wrong. Can someone please explain what I messed up on?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Whoops I used the wrong angle during my calculations so my actual answer is 4.6 x 10^5 but it is still wrong
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top