What is the Mass of the Block in a Ballistic Pendulum Collision?

  • Thread starter Thread starter johndoe14
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Collisions
AI Thread Summary
A 12g bullet traveling at 1600m/s impacts a wooden block in a ballistic pendulum, causing it to swing and rise 1.40m. The bullet's momentum is calculated as 19.2 kgm/s. Participants discuss the conversion of the bullet's kinetic energy into the block's motion, questioning whether the block assumes the bullet's velocity upon impact. The kinetic energy of the bullet is calculated but corrected to reflect the proper formula. The discussion centers on determining the mass of the block based on the energy transfer during the collision.
johndoe14
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A 12g bullet is fired at 1600m/s into a wooden block of a ballistic pendulum, causing it to swing back, raising up 1.40m vertically. Find mass of the block



Homework Equations



N/a

The Attempt at a Solution



bullet momentum= 12g*1600m/s=19.2kgm/s
 
Physics news on Phys.org
johndoe14 said:

Homework Statement



A 12g bullet is fired at 1600m/s into a wooden block of a ballistic pendulum, causing it to swing back, raising up 1.40m vertically. Find mass of the block

Homework Equations



N/a

The Attempt at a Solution



bullet momentum= 12g*1600m/s=19.2kgm/s

Welcome to PF.

What's happened to the kinetic energy of the bullet? Think maybe it got translated into the block?
 
am i correct by saying that the block has a kinetic energy of____ due to the bullet

ke= .5*.012kg*1600m/s^2
= 15360kgm/s^2
 
johndoe14 said:
am i correct by saying that the block has a kinetic energy of____ due to the bullet

ke= .5*.012kg*1600m/s^2
= 15360kgm/s^2

Not quite. It's V2

If it absorbed that much KE and the block and bullet was raised by 1.4m then ...
 
do we assume that when the bullet collides with the block the block has the same velocity as the bullet?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top