What Is the Maximum Force Exerted by the Floor on the Ball?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the maximum force exerted by the floor on a rubber ball dropped from a height of 1.8 meters, which rebounds to two-thirds of its initial height. A participant initially calculated the maximum force as 0.176 N using impulse equations but encountered errors in their calculations, particularly in determining the velocity and time. Another contributor pointed out that the velocity should be derived from the height fallen using the equation V² = 2gh, which would provide the correct ΔV for the calculations. The conversation highlights the importance of accurately calculating the velocity and understanding the impulse-momentum relationship in solving the problem. Ultimately, the participants are working towards clarifying the correct approach to find the maximum force.
julz3216
Messages
18
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A 41 rubber ball is dropped from a height of 1.8 and rebounds to two-thirds of its initial height.
http://session.masteringphysics.com/problemAsset/1070447/4/09.P29.jpg
The figure (Part C figure) shows the impulse received from the floor. What maximum force does the floor exert on the ball?
t=5ms

Homework Equations



change in p = F*change in time
F=ma

The Attempt at a Solution



I tried and got Fmax = .176 by plugging into the 1st equation for impulse
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you solved the other problem you posted you should know how to solve this so long as you calculated your Impulse correctly from the info given.
 
So I tried to do F*change in t = change in m*v but it didn't work. i calculated velocity by doing change in d/ change in t. i used 2.5 for t because that is where fmax occurs and i also used d as 1.8 because that is the distance the ball travels in 2.5 seconds

so i got v=.72 and then mv=.029
so 2.5F = .029
F = .0116

and that was wrong. so i don't really know what to do?
 
julz3216 said:
So I tried to do F*change in t = change in m*v but it didn't work. i calculated velocity by doing change in d/ change in t. i used 2.5 for t because that is where fmax occurs and i also used d as 1.8 because that is the distance the ball travels in 2.5 seconds

so i got v=.72 and then mv=.029
so 2.5F = .029
F = .0116

and that was wrong. so i don't really know what to do?

Where did you get v = .72 from? It fell 1.8m

V2 = 2*9.8*1.8m

How fast does it bounce back?

Isn't that going to give you the ΔV that you want to use?

The 2.5 ms* Fmax looks ok though.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Replies
13
Views
8K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
19
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
3K
Back
Top