What is the minimum time for light to travel through two mediums?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Annes
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the challenge of applying equations to determine the minimum time for light to travel through two mediums. It highlights that setting dt/dx=0 can identify local stationary points, but proving a point is the minimum requires graphing or logical reasoning. There is confusion regarding the limits of dt/dx, with the assertion that taking the limit as x approaches zero only considers the shortest distance in the first medium, while limits approaching infinity lack physical relevance. The consensus suggests that teachers typically expect students to solve dt/dx and offer a reasonable explanation for why it minimizes time. Understanding these nuances is crucial for effectively addressing the problem.
Annes
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
i simply can't figure out how to make the equations work, so i copied everything into pictures.
 

Attachments

  • brydning.png
    brydning.png
    9.7 KB · Views: 424
  • 2.jpg
    2.jpg
    29.3 KB · Views: 367
  • 1.jpg
    1.jpg
    21.3 KB · Views: 385
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
dt/dx=0 will give local stationary points (minima or maxima). In the general case, there may be several points which satisfy dt/dx=0. So to actually prove that a point is the lowest possible t value, you would need to draw a graph and/or use good reasoning.

I don't understand why you were taking the limit of dt/dx as x goes to zero. This would give the case where the light goes the shortest distance through the first medium. And taking the limit as x goes to infinity makes no physical sense, because we would expect x<m.

In this problem, most teachers expect that you just try to solve dt/dx, rather than go into detail about why this minimises t. I don't know what your teacher is looking for, but I would guess he just wants you to solve dt/dx and provide a reasonable explanation to why it minimises t.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top