What is the N2/O2 Ratio at 3255m Using Laplace's Law?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Wolfmannm
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ratio
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the nitrogen to oxygen ratio at 3255 meters using Laplace's Law, starting with a known ratio of 4.0:1 at sea level. Participants highlight the importance of using molecular weights in kg/mol instead of g/mol for accurate calculations. The initial pressure is clarified as the total atmospheric pressure at sea level, not the partial pressures of nitrogen and oxygen. One user struggles with their calculations, noting that their exponential results in zero, indicating a potential misunderstanding of the formula or unit conversions. The conversation emphasizes the need for correct unit application and understanding of atmospheric pressure dynamics.
Wolfmannm
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The ratio of nitrogen to oxygen at sea level is 4.0:1. Use Laplace's law of
isothermal atmospheres to calculate the same ratio for 3255m above sea level
Assume that T = 273 K

Homework Equations


P_fN2 = P_iN2 * e^-\Big({\frac{M_N2 g}{R T}}*h\Big)
P_fO2 = P_iO2 * e^-\Big({\frac{M_O2g}{R T}}*h\Big)

P_i = 1 atm
h = 3255 meters
M_N2 = 28 g/mol
M_O2 = 32 g/mol
T = 273K
g = 9.8 m/s^2
R = 8.314 J/mol K

The Attempt at a Solution


I tried plugging in the numbers for both equations, but somehow that just makes my exponential go to 0 so I know that's not correct. I am wondering if I need to convert anything. I converted the initial pressure to Pa but that doesn't help me with an exponential of 0. For N2 I came up with approximately 393.52 for Mg/RT*h. e to -393.52 comes out zero on my calculator, I'm sure its not, because e to any power is never 0 but its too small for my calculator to read.[/B]
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your molecular weights must be expressed in kg / mole, rather than grams / mole.

Also, since you are given the ratio of nitrogen : oxygen at sea level, then the partial pressure of each element will not be 1.0 atm. That's the pressure of the whole atmosphere at sea level.
 
  • Like
Likes Chestermiller
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top