What is the near-point of the eye-plus-spectacle?

  • Thread starter Thread starter gungo
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the near point of the eye with spectacles, specifically addressing the power needed for a near point of 0.75 m. A participant calculated the eye's power using the formula P = 1/.25 m + 1/-.75 m, resulting in a power of 2.67 diopters. They then added this to the lens power of 0.75 diopters but encountered confusion when the expected near point was 48 cm instead of their calculated -1.72 m. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding the near point of a normal eye, which is typically 0.25 m, equating to a power of 4 diopters, but this exercise involves a different eye configuration.
gungo
Messages
27
Reaction score
1
Homework Statement
A hyperopic eye has a near point of 75 cm. If a lens of power .75 d is placed in front of the eye, what is the near point of the eye-plus spectacle?
Relevant Equations
P= 1/p + 1/q
I found the power of the eye itself by doing P= 1/.25 m + 1/ -.75 m. I used negative .75 m because the image would be on the same side of the object. I got a power of 2.67 d. The I added that to the .75 d of the lens. Then I used the same equation and did 3.42= 1/.25 m +1/q to find q, and got -1.72 m. However, the answer is 48 cm.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi,

Where does the 0.25 come from?

What power is really needed for a near point of 0.75 m ?
 
BvU said:
Hi,

Where does the 0.25 come from?

What power is really needed for a near point of 0.75 m ?
I learned in class that 0.25 m was the near point of a normal eye
 
gungo said:
the near point of a normal eye
So a normal eye has a power of 4 d. But:
This exercise is about a different eye ! Namely, with a power of ...
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top