What is the near-point of the eye-plus-spectacle?

  • Thread starter Thread starter gungo
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the near point of the eye with spectacles, specifically addressing the power needed for a near point of 0.75 m. A participant calculated the eye's power using the formula P = 1/.25 m + 1/-.75 m, resulting in a power of 2.67 diopters. They then added this to the lens power of 0.75 diopters but encountered confusion when the expected near point was 48 cm instead of their calculated -1.72 m. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding the near point of a normal eye, which is typically 0.25 m, equating to a power of 4 diopters, but this exercise involves a different eye configuration.
gungo
Messages
27
Reaction score
1
Homework Statement
A hyperopic eye has a near point of 75 cm. If a lens of power .75 d is placed in front of the eye, what is the near point of the eye-plus spectacle?
Relevant Equations
P= 1/p + 1/q
I found the power of the eye itself by doing P= 1/.25 m + 1/ -.75 m. I used negative .75 m because the image would be on the same side of the object. I got a power of 2.67 d. The I added that to the .75 d of the lens. Then I used the same equation and did 3.42= 1/.25 m +1/q to find q, and got -1.72 m. However, the answer is 48 cm.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi,

Where does the 0.25 come from?

What power is really needed for a near point of 0.75 m ?
 
BvU said:
Hi,

Where does the 0.25 come from?

What power is really needed for a near point of 0.75 m ?
I learned in class that 0.25 m was the near point of a normal eye
 
gungo said:
the near point of a normal eye
So a normal eye has a power of 4 d. But:
This exercise is about a different eye ! Namely, with a power of ...
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
995
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
10K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K