What is the net charge of the ball?

  • Thread starter Thread starter elee123
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ball Charge Net
AI Thread Summary
A 3.94 g plastic ball suspended in a 3400 N/C electric field is in equilibrium at a 43.2° angle with the vertical. To find the net charge on the ball, the gravitational force (mg) and the electric force (E*q) must be analyzed, considering their relationship through trigonometric functions. The discussion highlights confusion in applying the equations E=F/q and Fe=kq/r^2 to derive the charge. Participants suggest visualizing the forces acting on the ball to clarify the problem. Understanding the balance of vertical and horizontal forces is crucial for solving for the net charge in microcoulombs (μC).
elee123
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
1.A small 3.94 g plastic ball is suspended by a
27.9 cm long string in a uniform electric field
of 3400 N/C.
The acceleration of gravity is 9.8 m/s2 , and
the Coulomb constant is 8.99×109 N · m2/C2.
If the ball is in equilibrium when the string
makes a 43.2◦ angle with the vertical as in-
dicated, what is the net charge on the ball?
Answer in units of μC.




2. E=F/q
Fe=kq/r^2




3. Well I'm kind of lost. When they ask for the net charge, I just plugged the F, found using F=mg, and electric field into the equation E=F/q. And then I used that q and plugged it into the Fe=kq/r^2 equation, and found q. I thought that was the answer, but apparently not. I don't understand how to do the problem at ALL. please help. thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF.

Maybe make a drawing of the charged object and put all your forces acting on it in?
 
thanks.
I tried that. but after putting the forces in, I dunt know where to go from there.
 
Yeah ... but.

How might you explain the ball being at the angle described?

Isn't there an m*g force down and a E*q force horizontally?

Might that mean then that the vertical force is related to the horizontal force by some trig function of θ ?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top