What is the Net Force on a Block on a Moving Incline?

  • Thread starter Thread starter AirForceOne
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Block Incline
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving a small block of mass m resting on a triangular block of mass M, which is on a horizontal table. The goal is to determine the force F required to keep block m stationary relative to block M on a frictionless incline.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the forces acting on block m, including gravitational force and the applied force F. There are attempts to set up equations based on free body diagrams (FBDs) and to analyze the components of forces in different directions.
  • Some participants question the reasoning behind splitting forces into x and y components, particularly regarding the normal force and gravitational force.
  • Others suggest drawing FBDs for both blocks to clarify the relationships between the forces and to derive the necessary equations for the system.
  • There is a focus on ensuring that the acceleration of the blocks is consistent with the forces acting on them.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing hints and guidance on how to approach the problem. Some participants express confusion about the components of forces and the implications of their chosen coordinate systems. There is a recognition of the need to analyze the system as a whole or in parts to derive the correct relationships.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working under the assumption that all surfaces are frictionless, which influences the dynamics of the blocks. There are also references to Newton's laws and the importance of action-reaction pairs in the context of the forces involved.

AirForceOne
Messages
49
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A small block of mass m rests on the sloping side of a triangular block of mass M which itself rests on a horizontal table. Assuming all surfaces are frictionless, determine the magnitude of the force F that must be applid to M so that m remains in a fixed position relative to M (that is, m doesn't move on the incline).

Homework Equations



F = ma

The Attempt at a Solution



I find the forces on block m due to gravity and the force F. So the net force on that block is:
Fcos(theta)+mgsin(theta)=ma

Since the block m isn't moving, I set the net force on it equal to zero (?):
Fcos(theta)+mgsin(theta)=0

And I solve for F:
F= -mgtan(theta)

The actual answer is:
F=(m+M)gtan(theta)

What am I missing? I've been scratching my head for awhile now...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
AirForceOne said:

Homework Statement



A small block of mass m rests on the sloping side of a triangular block of mass M which itself rests on a horizontal table. Assuming all surfaces are frictionless, determine the magnitude of the force F that must be applid to M so that m remains in a fixed position relative to M (that is, m doesn't move on the incline).

Homework Equations



F = ma

The Attempt at a Solution



I find the forces on block m due to gravity and the force F. So the net force on that block is:
Fcos(theta)+mgsin(theta)=ma

Since the block m isn't moving, I set the net force on it equal to zero (?):
Fcos(theta)+mgsin(theta)=0

And I solve for F:
F= -mgtan(theta)

The actual answer is:
F=(m+M)gtan(theta)

What am I missing? I've been scratching my head for awhile now...

Draw a FBD for the small block, and prove that its horizontal acceleration must be equal to
[itex]\rm a_x = g tan\theta[/itex], if its vertical acceleration is to equal zero, i.e. [itex]\rm a_y =0[/itex]. Please note, there is no F in the FBD diagram for the small block, only the externally applied N and mg. You could now do a FBD for the large block, making sure you include the action-reaction pair, to determine the necessary F. But a quicker way would be to isolate both blocks together and apply [itex]\rm F = (m+M) a_x[/itex], since the two move as one.

So, step one, draw a FBD for the small block and figure out how the contact force N breaks up into vertical and horizontal components. Let me know how it's going, and we'll see if you need some more hints.
 
Last edited:
Isn't the normal force perpendicular to the surface of the incline? Why would there be x and y components of it.

Thanks
 
AirForceOne said:
Isn't the normal force perpendicular to the surface of the incline? Why would there be x and y components of it.

Thanks

This will help you to get started:

http://img32.imageshack.us/img32/8211/blocks1d.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I gotcha.

x-dir: Nsin(theta)=ma
y-dir: Ncos(theta)-mg=0

a=gtan(theta)

How come the net forces will not be the same if I decide to split mg into x and y components instead of splitting the normal force? How do I know which to split?
 
AirForceOne said:
I gotcha.

x-dir: Nsin(theta)=ma
y-dir: Ncos(theta)-mg=0

a=gtan(theta)

How come the net forces will not be the same if I decide to split mg into x and y components instead of splitting the normal force? How do I know which to split?

Good job!

If you look at the picture, the system is going to accelerate in the horizontal direction (+x for my picture). Therefore the net force on the system is a vector pointing in, for my picture, the +x direction as well. You can make a coordinate system anywhere you want, but then you would have to break the applied F up into components as well. The coordinate system I chose makes solving the problem as simple as possible. For example, consider solving circular motion problems with x-y cartesian coordinates, you can do it, but it just makes the problem more difficult, as opposed to using r-[itex]\rm \theta[/itex] unit vectors (cylindrical coordinates) which vastly simplifies things.

Now that you've got a handle on this problem, try to see if you can get the required result by isolating the large mass M, and using Newton's 2nd postulate, [itex]\rm {\bf F}_{net} = M {\bf a}[/itex]. Here's the picture:

http://img69.imageshack.us/img69/894/blocks2.jpg

Note: (1) Newton's 3rd postulate: the force N must be applied to the mass M, equal magnitude and opposite direction, since M applied N on little m. This is the action-reaction pair I mentioned earlier. (2) I moved the contact force [itex]\rm \eta[/itex], the contact force from the floor, a little to the left so you could see where Mg and [itex]\rm \eta[/itex] are being applied.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Okay I think I understand now...pick a coordinate system and stick with it...

For the larger block:
x-dir: F-Nsin(theta)=M(gtan(theta))
y-dir: Ncos(theta)-mg=0

Plugging N=mg/cos(theta) into the x-direction net force:
F-mgtan(theta)=Mg(tan(theta))
F=Mg(tan(theta))+mgtan(theta)

F=(M+m)gtan(theta)

Great! Thanks a lot!
 
AirForceOne said:
Okay I think I understand now...pick a coordinate system and stick with it...

For the larger block:
x-dir: F-Nsin(theta)=M(gtan(theta)) (Note: this is from the FBD for M)
y-dir: Ncos(theta)-mg=0 (Note: this is from the FBD for m)

[itex]\rm \eta-Mg-NCos\theta = 0[/itex] (this is from the FBD for M, but you don't need it)

Plugging N=mg/cos(theta) into the x-direction net force:
F-mgtan(theta)=Mg(tan(theta))
F=Mg(tan(theta))+mgtan(theta)

F=(M+m)gtan(theta)

Yes, good job! You needed information from doing two FBDs, for (1) m and M, or (2) m and (m+M) as a system. When you do (m+M) as a system, the action-reaction pair doesn't show up, it's "internal" to the system -- they cancel by Newton's 3rd postulate.

Now, since you're becoming a physicist, you should look at your result for [itex]\rm a_x = g tan \theta[/itex], and ask if it makes physical sense when [itex]\rm \theta = 0^o[/itex], and [itex]\rm \theta = 90^o[/itex]. :cool:
 
Wait so how do you find the normal force of the larger block? Haha.

Thanks!
 
  • #10
That was a serious question, by the way. :smile:
 
  • #11
AirForceOne said:
That was a serious question, by the way. :smile:

Oh? It was? lol.

I think I wrote it down earlier. Up there somewhere...hang on, there it is:

https://www.physicsforums.com/latex_images/25/2590137-0.png

from the summation [itex]\rm F_{y_{net}} = M a_y[/itex]
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #12
I meant: What is the magnitude of lower-case n, the normal force on the larger block?

Because now if I plug that equation into the net force equation for the x direction, I still have an unknown variable n...

EDIT: Nevermind. I don't need to use that equation (N-Mg-Ncos(theta)=0) because that's not what I want when finding F anyways...so that's what you mean by "you don't need it" haha...my bad
 
Last edited:
  • #13
Look at the equation n-Mg-Ncos(theta)=0. You don't know N, so look at the other equations you wrote down to find it.
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
900
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
31
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K