What is the net force on the fish in this fishing scenario?

AI Thread Summary
In the fishing scenario, the net force on the fish must account for both the tension in the line and the gravitational force acting on the fish. The correct approach involves using the equation T - mg = ma, leading to the conclusion that the fish's mass must be greater than 6.99 kg. The confusion arose from not initially considering the gravitational force alongside the acceleration of the fishing line. In the second question regarding the baseball, the average force applied can be calculated using the derived acceleration, and the sign of the force depends on the chosen coordinate system. Understanding these principles is essential for correctly applying Newton's laws of motion.
reliquator
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
I'm on the 3rd unit of my physics unit and we're applying Newton's 3 Laws of motion.

There's this problem:

"A fisherman yanks a fish out of the water with an acceleration of 4.5 m/s^2 using very light fishing line that has a "test" value of 100 N. The fisherman unfortunately loses the fish as the line snaps. What can you say about the mass of the fish?"

Okay, I thought that using the F = MA formula would work, with 100=4.5 * M, which means that the mass of the fish was greater than 22 and 2/9 KG.

WRONG. The answer guide I'm working from says the mass of the fish > 7.0 kg. Did I use the wrong formula?

Thanks ahead of time guys.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Of course F = ma works. But you've got to consider all the forces acting on the fish, not just the tension in the line. (You forgot gravity.)
 
Doc Al said:
Of course F = ma works. But you've got to consider all the forces acting on the fish, not just the tension in the line. (You forgot gravity.)

Okay, I've got it. 100 = (9.8 + 4.5) * M

M = 6.99 Kg, so the fish has to be heavier than 6.99 Kg. But what I don't get is, why would you add 4.5 (acceleration of the line) with accel due to gravity? Thanks to all in advance.

Edit: Question #2

"A 0.145-kg baseball traveling 30.0 m/s strikes the catcher's mitt, which, in bringing the ball to rest, recoils backward 11.0 cm. What was the average force applied by the ball on the glove"

Okay, I don't need an answer to this problem but would like to know how to approach it. I'm inferring that you need to find the FORCE applied to the baseball. Its given a mass but no acceleration. Would acceleration be 0, or 9.8?

Edit2: Okay, so I think I figured it out. I have the displacement, vi, vf, and need a. so vf^2 = vi^2 + 2ad, and I get a = -4090.91 m/s^2.

Aight, so I do F= MA, and get force = 593.18 N, am I correct, and if so, should the 593.18 N be negative? Thanks again all.
 
Last edited:
reliquator said:
Okay, I've got it. 100 = (9.8 + 4.5) * M

M = 6.99 Kg, so the fish has to be heavier than 6.99 Kg. But what I don't get is, why would you add 4.5 (acceleration of the line) with accel due to gravity?
To apply Newton's 2nd law, you must use the net force on the fish. The net force is Tension (up) - mg (the weight, down) = T - mg. Set that equal to ma: T - mg = ma.
Edit: Question #2

...

Aight, so I do F= MA, and get force = 593.18 N, am I correct, and if so, should the 593.18 N be negative?
Looks OK to me. I'm sure the magnitude of the force is all they are looking for. (The sign is arbitrary--it depends on your coordinate system.)
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top