What is the original purpose of the Laplace-Runge Lenz vector?

  • Thread starter Thread starter BobG
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Lenz Vector
AI Thread Summary
The Laplace-Runge-Lenz (LRL) vector originally aimed to analyze orbital eccentricity in celestial mechanics, revealing deeper symmetries in central force problems. It relates to gravitational constants but appears incomplete without normalization, suggesting alternative methods for determining eccentricity may have existed. The LRL vector commutes with the Hamiltonian, indicating a larger symmetry algebra and additional conserved quantities, although their physical significance remains unclear. Its applications extend to quantum mechanics, particularly in deriving solutions for spherical problems and analyzing the hydrogen atom's symmetry. Further exploration of related literature and research on the LRL vector is encouraged for those interested in its implications.
BobG
Science Advisor
Messages
352
Reaction score
88
What was the original purpose of the Laplace Runge Lenz vector?

I understand the components (comparing centrifugal force to gravitational force) and, more importantly, that if you multiply the LRL by the reciprical of the geocentric gravitational constant (or helio..., etc), you get a vector that points towards perigee in a magnitude that tells you your eccentricity.

But, as is (before you convert to the eccentricity vector), it seems to be incomplete? If it was designed to calculate an orbit's eccentricity, you would think he would have divided out the geo/helio/etc centric constant right off the bat. The only thing I can think of is that a different method, independent of a geocentric gravitational constant, used to be used to find the eccentricity and that, if the eccentricity were already known, the LRL vector might have been used to calculate the geocentric gravitational constant?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
The idea is that central force problems have a deeepr symmetry than SO3.
The LRL vector shows that this is so.
It was noted that since it commuted with the hamiltonian (possion brackets there i guess, classically) there was a larger symmetry algebra and another conserved quantity. Though there was no good physical interpretation of this quantity it ws considred valauble form the standpoint of symmetry

There's actually a very cool way to derive the modes of spherical problems using it and Pauli used it to look at the schrodinger eq for spinless non rel hydrogen. I did an undergrad project that devloped this method in modern language and showed that subgroups of SO4 (interesting ones) abound in the simple schrodinger problem despite the fact that QM books say nothing about it.


Sternberg makes some lame comments about this in his otherwise pretty cool book "Group Theory and Physics" but if you want more details let me know and i can point you to some obscure papers that i once dug up.
 
Last edited:
I suggest reading the work by Delande and Gay, as well as Dieter Wintgen. My dissertation has a very-readable appendix devoted to the symmetry of the hydrogen atom with respect to the Runge-Lenz vector, and I can email anyone interested a copy.
 
Cool.
Does it include discussion of representations of S0(4,2) ~ S0(2,1) X S0(4)?
I believe the related work of Demeyer, Vanden Berge and Fack is collected in a book of papaers presented at the 15th internatrional Coloquim on Group Theoretical Methods in Physcis.
 
Yes, to your question. It also includes a complete primer on Lie algebra.
 
Hello John,

I have a colleague who is interested in your thesis, and trying to track it down.

I hope this can find it's way...
 
Is a homemade radio telescope realistic? There seems to be a confluence of multiple technologies that makes the situation better than when I was a wee lad: software-defined radio (SDR), the easy availability of satellite dishes, surveillance drives, and fast CPUs. Let's take a step back - it is trivial to see the sun in radio. An old analog TV, a set of "rabbit ears" antenna, and you're good to go. Point the antenna at the sun (i.e. the ears are perpendicular to it) and there is...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Back
Top