What Is the Oscillation Period for a Particle in a Hyperbolic Potential Field?

  • Thread starter Thread starter renegade05
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Oscillation Period
renegade05
Messages
52
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Determine the oscillation period, as a function of energy E, when a particle of mass m moves in a field with potential energy V(x)=-V_0/cosh^2(\alpha x), for -V_0 < E < 0 with Vo positive.

(a) First show that, with s=sinh (α x) and determining the appropriate smax ,the period satisfies

T=\frac{2\sqrt{2m}}{\alpha\sqrt{E}}\int_{0}^{S_{max}}\frac{ds}{\sqrt{s^2}+\frac{E+U_o}{E}}

Homework Equations


Not sure where to start. My text-book is of no help when it comes to this question


The Attempt at a Solution


I am not sure where to start...

Can someone help me with this one. thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Show some attempt. You know you need to use energy ideas. What can you say about the relation between kinetic energy, potential energy, and total energy E?
 
T + v = e... Don't see what the would do?
 
Suppose you could express the speed v as a function of x. Note v = dx/dt. So, you would have dx/dt = some function of x.
 
Ya I get that, i just don't know how to get smax
 
What can you say about the value of the potential energy V(x) when s = smax?
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top