What is the period of the loaded tuning fork?

AI Thread Summary
Two identical tuning forks vibrate at 256 Hz, but when one is loaded with wax, it produces 6 beats per second, indicating a frequency change. The loaded fork vibrates at a lower frequency due to the added mass, which affects the restoring force and results in slower vibrations. The relationship between the restoring force and the weight of the fork's tines explains this phenomenon, as the increased mass leads to a decrease in frequency. The discussion clarifies that the loaded fork's frequency is lower because the added mass does not alter the restoring energy but slows down the vibrations. Understanding this principle is crucial for analyzing the effects of mass on oscillating systems.
blue.flake
Messages
11
Reaction score
1
Member advised to use the homework template for posts in the homework sections of PF.
Two identical tuning forks vibrate at 256 Hz. One of them is then loaded with a drop of wax, after which 6 beats/s are heard. The period of the loaded tuning fork is?

So, as the uploaded pictures shows, I did solve the problem, but I'm not sure why the f1 frequency is bigger than f2. I mean how can I be sure which one should I subtract from the other?
1.PNG


edit: yeah i just noticed i messed up the unit for the period, I'm sorry..
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A tuning fork will vibrate at a lower frequency when loaded.
 
thank you, but can you explain to me why exactly?
 
In simple terms, the fork's material has a solid material shape which if deformed, e.g. if a tine is struck, it will tend to "bounce back" to its original shape. This occurs with a restoring force due to the structure and shape of the fork. Each tine of the fork has weight. The relationship between the restoring force and the weight determines the frequency. Adding the wax does not change the way the fork's restoring energy works, it only adds mass to the system. From general knowledge of oscillators mass loaded vibrators such as spring systems or just by thinking about F=M*a (recall M increases but F stays the same) you can generalize that the extra mass will make the tine vibrate slower.
 
thank you so much ^_^
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top