What is the Phase Constant for a Simple Harmonic Oscillator with Given Graphs?

  • Thread starter Thread starter foundAnAnswer
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Constant Phase
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on determining the phase constant of a simple harmonic oscillator using its position and velocity graphs. The position function is given as x(t) = xmcos(ωt + ϕ) and the velocity function as v(t) = -ωxmsin(ωt + ϕ). The user initially attempted to equate the position and velocity values at t=0 but encountered confusion. Ultimately, they found that using the ratio of velocity to position, adjusted for angular frequency, led to the correct phase constant calculation. The final answer for the phase constant was determined to be approximately 1.01 radians after accounting for the phase shift.
foundAnAnswer
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Part (a) of the figure below is a partial graph of the position function x(t) for a simple harmonic oscillator with an angular frequency of 1.35 rad/s; Part (b) of the figure is a partial graph of the corresponding velocity function v(t). The vertical axis scales are set by xs = 6.5 cm and vs = 7.0 cm/s. What is the phase constant of the SHM if the position function x(t) is given by the form x = xmcos(ωt + ϕ)?

15-20.gif


Homework Equations


x = xmcos(ωt + ϕ)
v = -ωxmsin(ωt + ϕ)

The Attempt at a Solution



For the X vs. t graph the line crosses t=0 when x = 2.6. For the V vs. t graph the line crosses t=0 when v=-5.6.

I thought then I could just plug all the number in and find out when they are equal

2.6 = 6.5cos(1.35*0+ϕ)
-5.6 = -8.775sin(1.35*0+ϕ)

I subtracted 2.6 from both sides for the first equation and added 5.6 to both sides for the second. I then set them equal. I used my calculator to attempt to solve them.

Looking at them separately it looks like it should be 1.15 radians for X and .69 radians for V (Roughly).

I can't figure out what I'm doing wrong. Perhaps I shouldn't be reading the graph like I am. or I am simply reading it wrong.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Found an answer. I don't understand why this is correct, but dividing velocity by position gives the following

v/x = tan-1(\frac{Velocity @ t=0}{Position @ t=0 TIMES Angular Frequency})

So that leaves


tan-1(\frac{-5.6}{2.6 * 1.35}) = -1.01

I think then since it is shifted I changed it to positive 1.01.

That answer was taken as correct.
 
One equation represents position and the other represents velocity. Since the units are different, you can never "set them equal."
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top