What is the Potential Energy of Charge A in a Finite Grid of Alternate Charges?

AI Thread Summary
The potential energy of charge A in a finite grid of alternating charges is calculated using the formula E_p = (1/4πε₀)(qq'/r). The distance between charges is established as 2a, leading to a summation of terms based on their distances from charge A. It is noted that many charges are equidistant from A, simplifying the calculation by avoiding the need to compute all distinct distances. The final expression for potential energy incorporates a summation over a coordinate system, excluding the origin where charge A is located. This approach effectively addresses the complexities of the problem without cancellations.
Redsummers
Messages
162
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



The potential energy between charges q and q' at distance r is given by:

E_p=\frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon_0}\frac{qq'}{r}

A regular plane arrangement of alternate positive and negative charges of the same magnitude is obtained by placing the charges at the centre of squares of side a.

Calculate the potential energy of charge A in the electric field created by the others charges for the finite grid (see the attached image).


The Attempt at a Solution



So, we know that the distance between two charges is going to be 2a, as described in the problem. So then, if we work out this equation:

U_E=\frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon_0}(\frac{q_1q_2}{r_{1,2}}+\frac{q_1q_3}{r_{1,3}}+...)

according to our problem, we get:

U_E=\frac{q^2}{4\pi\epsilon_0}(\frac{1}{r_{1,2}}-\frac{1}{r_{1,3}}\pm...)

and so on, alternating the signs.

And at this point, I don't know what should I do, it looks rather like a geometrical problem involving a finite series (i.e. converge). It looks like most of the distances are going to cancel, but it's not trivially seen how they cancel, because it's not that we're going to sum the 48 different distances anyway, neither that it looks to give 0 as a result. I guess it should have something to do with Pythagoras' theorem, but I don't see how to apply it here. Any help would be appreciated.

Note: For some reason the equations are shown up as if I used the slash /, but in fact I used \, I don't know why the LaTeX is not working... Hope you can see the equations correctly.
 

Attachments

  • Field.png
    Field.png
    6.6 KB · Views: 440
Physics news on Phys.org
Redsummers said:
And at this point, I don't know what should I do, it looks rather like a geometrical problem involving a finite series (i.e. converge). It looks like most of the distances are going to cancel, but it's not trivially seen how they cancel, because it's not that we're going to sum the 48 different distances anyway, neither that it looks to give 0 as a result. I guess it should have something to do with Pythagoras' theorem, but I don't see how to apply it here. Any help would be appreciated.
I don't see any cancellations, as I don't see any opposite-sign charges that have the same distance to A. Looks like you need to slog through this and do the summation.

One thing I do notice is that many charges are the same distance from A. So you don't need to calculate all 48 separate, distinct terms.

Note: For some reason the equations are shown up as if I used the slash /, but in fact I used \, I don't know why the LaTeX is not working... Hope you can see the equations correctly.
The equations look fine.
 
Yeah, thanks! I have actually figured it out already, and as you said nothing cancels so far.
If you actually put the finite field in i,j coordinates system, where for instance, we would have a negative charge at (0,1) and a positive one at (0,2), you came up with a sum like this:

E_p= \frac{q^2}{4a\pi\epsilon_0}\sum_{i,j=-n}^{n} \frac{(-1)^{i+j+1}}{\sqrt{i^2+j^2}}

Where n will depend on how big is our field. Oh! and we should exclude i,j = 0 from the sum, i.e. not counting the point (0,0), since we have to calculate the potential energy at that point.
 
Last edited:
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top