What Is the Potential When Fe^(2+) Changes by .393 M?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the potential change when the concentration of Fe^(2+) increases by 0.393 M in a galvanic cell involving Cd^(2+) and Fe. The line notation indicates a standard cell potential of 0.04 V at 297 K. There is confusion regarding the proper adjustment of concentrations for the reaction quotient (Q), specifically whether to add or subtract the change in concentration. Participants agree that the question is poorly worded, leading to uncertainty about the direction of concentration changes. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding reaction stoichiometry and the need for clarity in problem statements.
ThirdEyeBlind
Messages
9
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Line Notation Fe | Fe^(2+) (0.587) || Cd^(2+) (1.009) | Cd
T = 297 K
E(cell standard) = .04 V

Find the potential when [Fe^(2+) changes by .393 M

Work
Cd^(2+) + Fe --> Cd + Fe^(2+)
Q = [Fe^(2+)] / [Cd^2+]

Q= [.587 + .393] / [1.009-.393]


The Attempt at a Solution


After I got the problem wrong and I worked backwards to get the answer but I am not sure I understand it. When finding the Q value, how do I know to add .393 M to Fe^2+ and subtract .393 M from Cd^(2+)? To me the question is vague and just says changes by .393 M, not increase or decrease so how I know [Fe^2+] must increase?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I agree, questions is badly worded (or you have not quoted it properly).

I guess what they mean is that reaction in this cell will spontaneously go in one obvious direction (driven by the potential difference, or thermodynamics). That also means you can easily calculate - from the reaction stoichiometry - how much Cd must react if Fe reacts. There is a problem though: I don't know if volumes of both solutions are identical, so "add here subtract here" is in general wrong.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top