What is the primary source for the origin of elements?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Orion78
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Elements Origin
Orion78
Messages
25
Reaction score
0
By choosing among the following five options, what is the main source in the universe for the origin of the elements : silicon, lithium, bismuth, nickel and uranium?

Primordial nucleosynthesis – fusion in core of low-mass stars – fusion in core of high-mass stars – slow neutron capture in high mass-stars - rapid neutron capture in supernovae.

The following is what I think is the right answer but I'd like to be confirmed.

silicon = Fusion in core of low-mass star
lithium = Primordial nucleosynthesis
bismuth = Low neutron capture in high mass-stars
nickel = Fusion in core of low-mass star
uranium = Rapid neutron capture in supernovae

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Bismuth and nickel both have atomic numbers greater than that of iron. So...you might want to re-evaluate your answers for those.

You are correct that lithium is produced in trace amounts during big bang nucleosynthesis. Whether this was the *main* source of lithium in the universe, I admit that I am not sure of. It certainly seems like stars produce carbon and oxygen directly from helium fusion, by means of the triple-alpha process, leaving it an open question (to me) by what other natural processes light elements like lithium would be produced aside from in the early universe.

You're right that uranium definitely requires supernovae to produce it.

I'm not sure what you're calling "low mass" vs. "high mass", but bear in mind that anything that will end as a white dwarf isn't going to be producing silicon in its core. A star has to be *several* solar masses (like 8-10) just to get hot enough for carbon fusion to ignite in the core: otherwise carbon and oxygen are the end of the line (they certainly will be for the sun). I may have said too much already: I don't want to give you answers to things that you should know.
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top