What Is the Radius of Earth Based on Sunset Observation?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Time-X
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Earth Radius
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the Earth's radius based on sunset observations while considering the observer's height and the time taken for the Sun to disappear from view. The problem involves understanding the geometry of the situation, including the Earth's curvature and the angle of elevation. Participants highlight the importance of incorporating Earth's rotation and the effect of atmospheric refraction on visibility. One participant successfully derives a radius of approximately 5,218 km, noting that while this is not the actual radius of Earth, the method provides insight into the calculations involved. The conversation emphasizes the complexities of such observational problems and the need for accurate modeling.
Time-X
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement

Suppose that, while lying on a beach near the equator watching the Sun set over a calm ocean, you start a stopwatch just as the top of the Sun disappears. You then stand,elevating your eyes by a height H=1.70 m, and stop the watch when the top of the Sun again disappears. If the elapsed time is t=11.1s, what is the radius r of Earth?

Homework Equations



Does the Earth's rotation speed come into account?

The Attempt at a Solution



This problem is baffling me, as I can't quite grip what to do or where to start. The Earth is also not flat either which introduces another problem. I am pretty sure there is going to be an equation with r in it. Then another one with r+1.7 in it. The other variable, I am not sure of but I know there has to be atleast another one. If someone could please draw a picture and upload, I immensely appreciate it as once I get a visual for what I am doing, I understand a whole lot more, but that is not the case with this problem. Thanks guys.
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Time-X said:
If someone could please draw a picture and upload, I immensely appreciate it as once I get a visual for what I am doing, I understand a whole lot more, but that is not the case with this problem. Thanks guys.

Here is a picture for you. The red lines are the rays of sun, they are parallel as the sun is very far away. The blue dot is your head. If you stayed lying, you would not see the sun after sunset as the Earth screens the rays, but you can still see them when you stand up. The Earth rotates so when you stand you go round along a circle of radius R+1.7 m.

ehild
 

Attachments

  • sunset.JPG
    sunset.JPG
    21.2 KB · Views: 5,145


Thank you, that pic helped me right away and I got it. I never thought about the sun's rays hitting the Earth, I tried to picture a beach and looking west and that way could not account for the Earth rotating. Thanks so much. Is the answer 5217957.989m? I got that but that is not the radius of the Earth...
 


The radius of Earth is 6370 km, you got 5218 km, it is not bad. I hope the problem did not want to take more things into account.

ehild
 


Actually, I checked the answer to the problem and what I got is correct, so I guess it was not related to the actual radius. I solved it like this: 11.1s/(3600*24)s=x/360, and so the angle was 11.1/240 degrees. There was a right triangle with hypotunese r+1.7, and a leg r. The angle between these two was 11.1/240 degrees and by using trig, I got the other leg to rtan(11.1/240). Then r^2+3.4r+2.89=r^2+.00087r^2, r= 5217957.989m.
 


OK, well done! The light bends in the atmosphere because of refraction and the sun is seen for some time after it is actually below the horizon, so this method is not too accurate. ehild
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top