What is the reason for the division by two in the angular momentum equation?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The division by two in the angular momentum equation arises from the integration of the force over displacement. Specifically, the equation transitions from the expression involving mass (m) and velocity (v) to the final form by applying the chain rule of calculus, resulting in the term being halved. This is not a typographical error but a necessary mathematical step to simplify the expression correctly. The key equation involved is the integral of force, which leads to the factor of 1/2 in the context of kinetic energy derivation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of classical mechanics principles
  • Familiarity with calculus, particularly integration techniques
  • Knowledge of angular momentum concepts
  • Proficiency in interpreting mathematical expressions and equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of kinetic energy from work-energy principles
  • Learn about the application of the chain rule in calculus
  • Explore angular momentum conservation laws in classical mechanics
  • Investigate the relationship between force, mass, and acceleration in physics
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, particularly those studying classical mechanics, educators teaching angular momentum concepts, and anyone seeking to deepen their understanding of the mathematical foundations of physics equations.

Pollywoggy
Messages
53
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I found this in Goldstein, Poole, and Safko and have seen it in other books. What I don't understand is how the equation gets from the second expression to the third; specifically, why is the m divided by two in the last expression? I am at a loss on this but I know it is not a typo.

Homework Equations


\int \mathbf{F} \cdot d\mathbf{s} = m \int \frac{d\mathbf{v}}{dt} \cdot \mathbf{v} dt = \frac{m}{2} \int \frac{d}{dt}(v^2)dt
 
Physics news on Phys.org
\frac{d \; v^2}{dt} = 2 v \frac{d v}{dt}
so to make this simply \frac{dv}{dt} v it needs to be divided by two.
 
Thanks, I knew it was something simple that I just could not see.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
1K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
948
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K