What Is the Relationship Between Constant Velocity, Force, and Work?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the relationship between constant velocity, force, and work, emphasizing that when an object moves at constant velocity with zero acceleration, the force acting on it is zero, resulting in no work done. Kinetic energy (KE) remains constant under these conditions, as it depends solely on mass and velocity, expressed by the formula KE = 0.5 * m * v^2. However, the conversation also explores the concept of energy expenditure in human movement, noting that while no mechanical work is performed when walking at constant velocity on level ground, energy is still consumed due to muscle exertion. The distinction is made that work is defined as a change in energy, not merely energy used, leading to questions about scenarios like walking uphill where potential energy changes occur. Overall, the discussion highlights the complexities of energy dynamics in physical activities.
Ret_24
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
The SI units for force is kg*m/s^2. So, if a object travels a certain distance with no acceleration, because it has a constant velocity. What is the force? Is it correct to find the KE, which units are kg*m^2/s^2 and divide the distance?

Also, KE is the energy from motion, correct? So, is that energy the same for any distance, if the velocity is constant? KE=.5*m*v^2. If so, how can that be?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Ret_24 said:
The SI units for force is kg*m/s^2. So, if a object travels a certain distance with no acceleration, because it has a constant velocity. What is the force? Is it correct to find the KE, which units are kg*m^2/s^2 and divide the distance?

If acceleration is 0 m/s^2, then the force on the object is 0N (since F=ma).

Ret_24 said:
Also, KE is the energy from motion, correct? So, is that energy the same for any distance, if the velocity is constant? KE=.5*m*v^2. If so, how can that be?

Since we have 0 m/s^2 acceleration we know that velocity is constant, and K.E is constant.

Let's see if our work energy equation gives the same result:

Work = Force * Distance = (K.Efinal - K.Einitial).

Force is 0N. So work is 0J. so:
K.Efinal-K.Einitial=0J
so K.Efinal=K.Einitial

So it all works out.
 
Great, thanks. That helps.

But answer this, if person walks 1 mile it will require a certain amount of kilojoules to "drive" this person to walk this far. So, they in take food to produce these kilojoules. So, how can there be no work? I understand the idea of change of energy or change in acceleration. But work is defined as change in energy and not energy used or created? :rolleyes:

Also would there be work if the person walk uphill at a certain angle for a certain distance? Potential?
 
Ret_24 said:
Great, thanks. That helps.

But answer this, if person walks 1 mile it will require a certain amount of kilojoules to "drive" this person to walk this far. So, they in take food to produce these kilojoules. So, how can there be no work? I understand the idea of change of energy or change in acceleration. But work is defined as change in energy and not energy used or created? :rolleyes:

Also would there be work if the person walk uphill at a certain angle for a certain distance? Potential?

Note that it's the frictional force that drives a person forward. He exerts a backward force on the ground with his feet, and the friction is the reactional force that pushes him forward.

We use up energy exerting forces with our muscles, even when those forces don't do any work! :smile: For example a weightlifter can lift up a weight and then hold it motionless. When he's lifting it up, chemical energy is being converted to mechanical energy in his arms, which is then transferred to the weight as kinetic energy and finally gravitational potential energy.

But while he's holding the weight up in the air, he's not doing any work on it (since it isn't moving). But he's still losing chemical energy, because the muscles need to remain in tension, and keep exerting the upward force on the weight. That energy that he's losing is converted to heat.

I believe that generally, as long as our muscles are exerting a force, we will be losing energy.
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top