What is the relationship between FS and HFS in the 3s3p Configuration?

Henk
Messages
22
Reaction score
0
I'm having some problems with the Fine and Hyperfine splitting (FS and HFS). For example the 3s3p Configuration, I understand the FS:
*****************************_______Mj=1
************1P________J=1*****_______ Mj=0
*****************************_______ Mj=-1
*
*
************3P______ Is split into J=0,1,2 and they are split into the Mj levels
*
*
3s3p_____

But where then is the HFS. I understand that I and J couple to F and that gives MF-levels but I don't know where to put in the picture above.

edit: the picture isn't very clear, sorry had to add some stars.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Henk said:
I'm having some problems with the Fine and Hyperfine splitting (FS and HFS). For example the 3s3p Configuration, I understand the FS:
*****************************_______Mj=1
************1P________J=1*****_______ Mj=0
*****************************_______ Mj=-1
*
*
************3P______ Is split into J=0,1,2 and they are split into the Mj levels
*
*
3s3p_____

But where then is the HFS. I understand that I and J couple to F and that gives MF-levels but I don't know where to put in the picture above.

edit: the picture isn't very clear, sorry had to add some stars.
What is the degeneracy of the Mj levels in the absense of the HFS ?

Perhaps, I should ask this first : Do you know where to put the hyperfine levels for the 1s orbital ?
 
For the 1s Orbital: L=0, S=1/2 thus J=1/2. That means the level has FS for J = 1/2 and J = -1/2. I don't know I so I can't give the F values however I suppose that the J-levels are splitted into the F-levels. And that if there is an external magnetic field (weak) the F-levels are splitted into 2F+1 Mf levels. Is this correct?
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top