What is the relationship between mass and acceleration based on given data?

  • Thread starter Thread starter novawinters
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Kinematics Physics
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on analyzing the relationship between mass and acceleration based on provided data. The individual graphed acceleration against mass but found no clear trend, noting that higher mass did not consistently correlate with higher acceleration. They questioned the data collection method and the nature of the objects involved, suggesting gravity may be the primary force at play. Despite some variations, the consensus is that there is insufficient information to establish a definitive relationship between mass and acceleration. Overall, the findings indicate that no significant correlation exists based on the given values.
novawinters
Messages
5
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I need to find the relation between mass and acceleration.I was given the values above in a table, save for acceleration.
The mass of the object was given as well, so that I could plot acceleration v. mass

This is part of my chart.
Object Mass (g) ti (s) Vi (m/s [d]) tf (s) Vf (m/s [d]) A (m/s2)
1 1696 0.65 0.244 1.00 3.526 9.37
2 573 0.45 0.399 0.80 3.709 9.45
3 151.95 0.45 0.575 0.80 3.674 8.85

Homework Equations


a = Vf-Vi/Tf - Ti

The Attempt at a Solution


I successfully graphed my 8 values, but I couldn't find a trend. When I adjusted the scale, it sort of looked like a sinusoidal function.

+ my original hypothesis that more mass is equal to increased acceleration was wrong, because some high mass values didn't have high acceleration values
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Like this?
acceleration.jpg


What are the "[d]" symbols?
Does it say what kind of objects are involved, what force accelerated them? Anything more?

As it stands, I would have to say there is no trend. No relationship can be found.
 
Looks like gravity accelerated them.

What are the other 5 mass values, along with the acceleration value for each?

Maybe the accelerations are nearly equal, with some random or systematic variation.

For the three values listed, there is not much correlation between mass and acceleration.

One of the masses is more than 10 times one of the others, yet it's acceleration in only a bout 5% higher than that of the smaller mass.
 
Here's my updated work:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/50168628/accelerationoffallingobject

I would appreciate if you could tell me whether I'm correct or not. Thanks
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I agree; no trend.
If you must have one, drop the one low acceleration point as unreasonable and the rest will probably have a line of best fit with a slight upward slope, so slightly more acceleration as the mass increases.
 
There is not enough information to draw any conclusions. "I was given the values above in a table" is not inspiring... How was this data collected? What was the setup of the experiment?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top