What is the required force to push a box up a slippery ramp?

  • Thread starter Thread starter luysion
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Box Forces Push
AI Thread Summary
To determine the force required to push a 10 kg box up a slippery ramp with a coefficient of friction of 0.1, a force diagram is essential. The normal force must be calculated considering the ramp's angle, and the frictional force should be included in the calculations. The initial calculations yielded 10N, but the correct force needed is 27N, indicating a miscalculation. Participants suggest clarifying the components of the normal force and applying Newton's second law for accurate results. A thorough understanding of the forces acting on the box is crucial for solving the problem correctly.
luysion
Messages
33
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A 10 kg
box is being pushed up a slippery ramp as shown in Figure 2.1.
The coefficient of friction between the box and the ramp is just
μ = 0.1.
(a) What force does the man need to apply to the box to
keep it traveling up the ramp at a steady speed?

Homework Equations


I have attached figure 2.1

The Attempt at a Solution


I worked out the normal reaction by finding the vertical component of the normal reaction acting on the box (as =mg) then i found out fmax by fmax = uN
but my answer is 10N and the actual answer is 27N!
what did i do wrong
 

Attachments

  • Untitled.jpg
    Untitled.jpg
    3.3 KB · Views: 467
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
luysion said:
I worked out the normal reaction by finding the horizontal component of the normal reaction...

Are you sure you meant to say 'normal reaction' twice here? I'm a bit confused by your work; what are you taking the horizontal component of?

Also, what do you mean with fmax? Is that the force the person has to push?
 
for this problem you'll want to start out by drawing a force diagram for the box and then applying Newton's second law.
 
fmax = frictional force
can somone please show me how to do this its bugging the crap out of me,
sonic91 arent the forces acting on the box friction and the normal reaction

mintea;
the normal reaction is angles because of the inclination, so the upwards force on the box i.e. that acts directly vertically would be the vertical component of the normal reaction i bymistake wrote the horizontal opps heh cheers
 
Last edited:
In that case, your work looks right; you just may be missing a force the man has to work against... I suggest what sonic91 said: put everything on a force diagram and go from there.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top