What is the Solution to the Equation with 8 and 1?

  • Thread starter Thread starter espania
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the unclear origins and meanings of the numbers 8 and 1 in a mathematical equation. Participants express confusion regarding the translation quality of the original document, suggesting it may have been poorly converted from another language. There is speculation that the equation could involve a formula related to velocity and distance, specifically \frac{l}{l'}= 1-\frac{v}{c}. The calculation of 630/560 leading to 1/8 is noted, but the overall context of the equation remains ambiguous. Ultimately, without additional information, a definitive solution to the equation involving 8 and 1 cannot be determined.
Physics news on Phys.org
Where is this from? That looks like a not-very-good translation into English from another language. The final question should be "How fast did he have to be going in order for his claim to be true?", NOT "How quickly he had to move in order his claim to be true."! Of course my (whatever was the original language) is non-existant so I can't complain.

There is clearly a problem with the PDF conversion (unfortunately, Adobe is not perfect and if this was originally done in some other language, there may have been non-standard characters used that Adobe did not recognize.)

I'm not certain what was supposed to be there but I do note that 630/560 = 1.125, 1 and 1/8 so that 1/8= 630/560- 1.

Perhaps the formula was intended to be
\frac{l}{l'}= 1-\frac{v}{c}

Then
\frac{v}{c}= 1- \frac{l}{l'}
which, with the values given would be 1/8.
 


The solution to the equation with 8 and 1 is not clear without more context. It is possible that the author is referring to a specific mathematical problem that involves the numbers 8 and 1. In this case, the solution would depend on the specific equation and cannot be determined without more information. It is also possible that the author is using 8 and 1 as variables in a general equation, in which case the solution would depend on the values assigned to those variables. Without more context, it is not possible to provide a definitive answer.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top