- #1
BWV
- 1,465
- 1,781
Is it fair to say that the 2nd Law basically is the law of large numbers, which given the immense numbers of microstates involved in entropy calculations, is inviolable?
With a Boltzmann distribution, one could have arbitrarily small decreases in entropy from time t to t+1 as for a system at equilibrium there would be some fluctuation proportional to the variance of the distribution. In a pool table example, while a return to the original state of the cue ball traveling toward the racked balls would be an incredibly unlikely event, one would expect that elastic collisions from time to time would leave one ball at rest - which would, I guess, be a trivial and temporary reduction of the dispersal of energy in the system. If this is correct, is there some statistical boundary (i.e. x standard deviations of the Bolzmann distribution) that would be have to passed to constitute a violation of the 2nd Law?
With a Boltzmann distribution, one could have arbitrarily small decreases in entropy from time t to t+1 as for a system at equilibrium there would be some fluctuation proportional to the variance of the distribution. In a pool table example, while a return to the original state of the cue ball traveling toward the racked balls would be an incredibly unlikely event, one would expect that elastic collisions from time to time would leave one ball at rest - which would, I guess, be a trivial and temporary reduction of the dispersal of energy in the system. If this is correct, is there some statistical boundary (i.e. x standard deviations of the Bolzmann distribution) that would be have to passed to constitute a violation of the 2nd Law?