What is the Tension on a Spring Scale for an Object on an Incline?

AI Thread Summary
To determine the tension on a spring scale for a 5.00 kg object on a 30-degree incline, the forces acting on the object must be analyzed using Newton's laws. The key equations involve calculating the forces in the x-direction (Fx = m*g*sin(theta)) and y-direction (Fy = n - m*g*cos(theta)). The spring scale reading corresponds to the force exerted by the object along the incline, which balances the gravitational component acting down the slope. It is clarified that the spring scale is not attached to the incline but rather to a wall behind it, emphasizing its role in measuring the tension. Ultimately, the spring scale will read the force equivalent to m*g*sin(theta).
saber1357
Messages
67
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


I am trying to understand how these Newton's laws work, specifically with an object on an incline.
If a 5.00kg object is attached to a Newton spring scale on an incline (incline makes 30 degrees with the ground), what reading is the scale giving?


Homework Equations


Fx = m*g*sin(theta)
Fy = n - m*g*cos(theta)


The Attempt at a Solution


Since the object is not accelerating upward, the netforce will equal zero. And I can solve for the force in the x direction. But how can I use these numbers to find the tension on the spring scale?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There are 2 forces in the x-direction... mgsin(theta) and the force the spring exerts (and this is what the spring scale reads)...

the two forces balance each other.
 
So I can simply ignore everything else, solve for the force in the x direction and what the spring reads is opposite of that?
 
saber1357 said:
So I can simply ignore everything else, solve for the force in the x direction and what the spring reads is opposite of that?

yes, I believe so. The object and the spring scale are both on the incline right? If that's the case then the spring scale simply reads mgsin(theta).

is the spring scale attached to the incline?
 
It's not attached to the incline, but a wall directly behind it. I believe that if the spring scale wasn't attached to anything, then there would be no purpose for it.
 
saber1357 said:
It's not attached to the incline, but a wall directly behind it. I believe that if the spring scale wasn't attached to anything, then there would be no purpose for it.

yes, that's true.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top