What is the total force exerted by block 2 on block 3 ?

  • Thread starter Thread starter aruji73
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Block Force
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the total force exerted by block 2 on block 3 in a system of four blocks on a frictionless table. Initially, a participant calculated the force as 67.5 N, which was incorrect. They later considered the combined weight of the two blocks above block 2, calculating it as 196 N, but still faced issues with the horizontal force component. The conversation emphasizes the importance of analyzing both horizontal and vertical forces to determine the net force accurately. Ultimately, the correct approach involves understanding the vector nature of the forces acting on the blocks.
aruji73
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
Four blocks EACH of mass m = 10.0 kg are arranged as shown in the picture, on top of a frictionless table. A hand touching block 1 applies a force of Fh1 = 90.0 N to the right. The coefficient of friction between the blocks is sufficient to keep the blocks from moving with respect to each other.

What is the total force exerted by block 2 on block 3 ?

I got 67.5 N which was wrong

F=90N-22.5=67.5N since a=9/4ms-2
 

Attachments

  • blocks.gif
    blocks.gif
    2.4 KB · Views: 732
Physics news on Phys.org
Start by drawing a free-body diagram showing all the forces. Pay particular attention to blocks 2 and 3, but don't ignore the others.
 
I now think block 2 would exert a force to block 3 equal to the combined weight of the 2 books above it which is f=2(mg) = 2*10*9.8 = 196 N

but i still get it wrong
 
That's part of it, but what about the horizontal direction?
 
i got it now its sqrt(of horizontal direction ^2 + vertical direction ^2)
 
Assuming you are referring to the forces on the block, that is indeed the magnitude of the net force. Now what is the direction?
 

Thread 'Errors and significant figures'

I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
View full post »
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'

Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'

Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
View full post »

Similar threads

Newton's law problem: Pushing 2 stacked blocks on a horizontal table
Replies
13
Views
3K
Calculating Net Force of 3 Blocks in an Elevator
Replies
9
Views
2K
Magnitude of Force Exerted on Middle Block in a Three-Block System
Replies
14
Views
4K
Distribution of Energy when work is done on a system of 2 masses connected by a spring
Replies
17
Views
1K
Find the force so that all blocks are at rest with respect to each other
Replies
20
Views
2K
Minimum force before a system of two blocks will move
Replies
6
Views
2K
Can a 10N Force Overcome Friction to Move a 10kg Block?
Replies
2
Views
1K
Determine the friction force in a stacked block scenario
Replies
23
Views
3K
Find the acceleration of the system (2 blocks sliding on a table)
Replies
23
Views
2K
External force on three blocks stacked
Replies
3
Views
6K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top